The answer to which is obvious, even to someone that took geometry nearly 30 years ago, or never, if they're willing to think for a few seconds.
The question is really: "which statement would explain why we can equate the lengths of the two line segments" - and there's really only one that's likely.

Bingo. I did the simplification to get 3 * 47, then looked in the ones place for likely results.

My kingdom - such as it is - for mod-points. This is exactly what I'm doing now, and it would be insanely painful to have one monitor with all this crap crammed into it. Also holds true developing and debugging windows applications; code/IDE on one monitor, application on the other; in certain cases, the window flip will cause events to be hit in code you don't want, and the "extra" monitor pays for itself almost instantly in reduced frustration and developer time.

It'll be For The Children. Or to help Thwart Terrorism. But really, it's just to help pay off the MPAA & RIAA, and make the jobs of the vast legions of winged lawyers that much easier.

If /dev/random is web scale, then I will use /dev/random

Neat. According to that page, I have version 10.2.154.18 installed, which isn't listed in their table. Mind you, I'm running a dev version of Chrome, so who knows what vulnerabilities I'm actually exposed to.

This seems remarkably topical, for some reason

I'm astounded that you - or anybody else would agree with RIAA's heavy handed tactics. For shame.

Not to put to fine a point on it, but somebody's doing something wrong. Remains to be seen if it's Civ V or the reviewer.

Nigh-obligatory PA reference, since I couldn't find a relevant one from XKCD: Le Twittre

Nope, they were charging too much to see a copy of the memo, and there was this NDA that I would have had to sign...

Makes you wonder what the full terms of the deal was. Hard to see that you could make any kind of deal with Sony and not have some Evil rub off on you.

This becomes a nasty little quandary for the ethics department - and it'll be interesting to see what comes of it. The Chrome browser is not only fairly decent (ignoring the current lack of extensions), but evolving at what can only be considered to be an alarming rate, at least if your a competitor.

Best response thus far: http://www.fakesteve.net/2009/08/likely-illegal-bitch-please.html. Glad he's back, honestly.

Probably, considering that I couldn't get my state treasury to issue a single old person. Stupid economy.

No, but I do think that you should work harder on your insults if you really mean them 'to cause substantial emotional distress'.