Absurd is an incredible understatement of the idiocy of the article. The light bulb was every bit as dependent on previous technology. Without blown glass, methods for extruding wire and countless tools it could never have been created. For Edison the tools were wire and glass. Now the tools are silicon, advanced alloys and software but they are no less of an invention because of it.
Obviously false statements, like calling the iPhone the first touch screen phone, show the ignorance of the writer. There are plenty of brilliant people inventing amazing new creations that are clearly beyond the comprehension of the writer. I've witnessed the invention of new molecules that bind pharmaceuticals and give them new properties and delivery methods. A new molecule is obviously an invention since it's parts are only atoms, but the advanced tools allowed the construction of the molecule.
This article certainly does not qualify as a new invention. It's just another version of Obama's "You didn't build that" ideals.