do you know how your computer works? Do really understand?
nope.
Partly because some of how it works is a corporate secret. Largely because you don't need to.
But that doesn't make you low tech.

Well of course they're identical. Otherwise we'd just end up flying in circles. it like two left feet.
Duh.

I saw a demonstration of this from MIT students. I'm pretty sure sony bought it, not developed.

Video
http://www.ted.com/talks/eric_giler_demos_wireless_electricity.html

Site
http://www.witricity.com/

they do offer voip over their fios service. i know i fixed them for a while.

Sure some mysterious unknown virus. Or Someone broke/deleted something and didn't know how to fix it. I mean would you want to tell the FBI you broke their computers?

Well usually you buy them a drink first.
But he is working pro bono...

Copyright laws aren't just sorta flawed, needs some kinks worked out. Copyrights last for generations. Plural. And if these laws are really to protect the creator, why is it that the creator of an actual item only deserves to have their rights protected for 20 years but if someone creates and idea they get protection for their entire life time plus seventy years (as in their childrens life time as well)?

What about copyrighted material broadcast on the radio and youtube. I know i wouldn't pay for all the "stuff" i see and hear. Would you?

I thought they already moved servers to the netherlands anyway. What would they be seizing?

So the chinese are just plain evil? All of em. Like getting "no color footage from them because their so evil the have no color" evil? I would think they've gotta be at least alittle good

I would say yeah because either people died just because nazi are evil, or because nazi's are evil and providing the world with information that could save others.

I thought one potential source of embryonic stem cells were unfertilized embryos... That kinda avoids the whole abortion thing.

You know you could also be struck and killed by a meteor. You wouldn't even have to get out of bed. Sorry i like "coulda" logic like that. Its usually got holes in it.

So wait the one that got federal funding got results and the one that didn't... didn't...
?

Yeah but thats kinda the point. There are ACS treatments, but no ECS treatments. One got federal funds, the other didn't.

Yes but how much would these have provided? I doubt Private companies would invest much without some sign of short term return. I have no idea what kind of budget states allot for research, but i'm pretty sure federal funding would be bigger.