Comment Re:Totally Underappreciated Taiwanese Geeks (Score 1) 321
Mod this post up
Mod this post up
"honor system"
Don't live in ATL do you?
And it's grown around privets to hide them.
Which came first ?
The bush or the shitter?
You mean Eric Estrada was a malware kingpin?
I don't believe it!
In the course of exploring their universe, mathematicians have occasionally stumbled across holes: statements that can be neither proved nor refuted with the nine axioms, collectively called “ZFC,” that serve as the fundamental laws of mathematics. Most mathematicians simply ignore the holes, which lie in abstract realms with few practical or scientific ramifications. But for the stewards of math’s logical underpinnings, their presence raises concerns about the foundations of the entire enterprise.
“How can I stay in any field and continue to prove theorems if the fundamental notions I’m using are problematic?” asks Peter Koellner, a professor of philosophy at Harvard University who specializes in mathematical logic.
To Settle Infinity Dispute, a New Law of Logic is an interesting article in Quanta Magazine exploring the disagreements among mathematicians about the continuum hypothesis.
Who wins in the ever-so-relevant showdown between forcing axioms and the inner-model axiom, "V=ultimate L"?
It's not the slightest mistake that gets you. It's "cutting doughnuts when the tires suddenly hook-up" that gets you.
Google "motorcycle highside" to see the equivalent on two wheels.
Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse