Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Not wiretapping (Score 1) 486

Wiretapping requires both parties in the conversation be unaware of the recording. From what it seems, only the officer was unaware, not the man being pulled over.

This is not wiretapping. A decent defense lawyer will get this thrown out in milliseconds.

Comment Detection (Score 1) 613

Microsoft probably doesn't use a heuristic approach to detecting cheating. They probably got tools on the console that can detect if a person's profile was edited using 3rd party tools. Microsoft doesn't want to reveal this process because it would make it easier for cheaters to bypass the system. It would be foolhardy for Microsoft to rely on a system that just flagged people for being "too good." Not even Blizzard, the king of banning people, does this. Blizzard has tools (Warden Client) to detect cheating and flag the account for further review. For example, Blizzard just doesn't say "this guy farmed 100 herbs a minute, he must be cheating". Instead Blizzard says "a known cheating program was detected on the system" or "he was herbing from under the terrain and using a memory hack to teleport from one node to another instantly".

Microsoft probably flagged his account as cheater because the Xbox detected because a process on the Xbox 360 detected the cheating, not that he's "too good" to have collected so many achievement points.

I think the mother is just being a mother and defending her son.

Comment Don't confuse legal arguments with personal belief (Score 4, Insightful) 463

Lawyers are paid to represent their CLIENT's interests, not their own. This guy could have personally disagreed with the RIAA and the Supreme Court's ruling, but as an attorney you are obligated to represent your client in the best possible manner.

I'm pretty sure a defense lawyer for Jarad Loughner personally believes her client is guilty and should get the chair for his crimes, but she's still obligated to defend her client as best as possible.

Comment Re:As soon as they ... (Score 0, Redundant) 368

The problem with getting rid of the "hate" crime category is that its a legal term. A person convicted of a hate crime has a more severe punishment then a non-hate crime offense.

Under the law, there is a difference between assaulting someone for some money and assaulting someone because their apart of a specific ethnic group.

Comment Re:All your base are belong to humans... (Score 1) 200

An AI could do micromanagement way better then a human ever could. An AI isn't encumbered by physical limitations, only by the quality of the programming and the processing power behind the bot.

The reason why an AI isn't that great in SC2 is because Blizzard's intention wasn't to make the bot able to crush humans. I bet you they could make a bot that crushes human players without violating the rules of the game, but what purpose would that serve for them?

Comment Re:All your base are belong to humans... (Score 2, Insightful) 200

Exactly. An AI could win by exhibiting super-human micromanagement by engaging enemeies in several locations at once, diverting the attention of the human player. Unlike Chess, which is a turn-based game, Starcraft 2 is a real-time game. This gives people who can manage multiple conflicts at once while still pumping out units and maintaining their economy will prevail. An advanced AI would roflstomp a human. Blizzard's "Insane" AI for multiplayer still follows the rules of human skill. An AI bot designed to crush a human opponent would not limit itself like that.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Money is the root of all money." -- the moving finger

Working...