Comment Re:Who cares? (Score 3, Insightful) 241
I'll conjecture that Grigory Perelman doesn't know who Brittany Murphy was, either.
And I'll further conjecture that Brittany Murphy didn't know who Grigory Perelman was.
I'll conjecture that Grigory Perelman doesn't know who Brittany Murphy was, either.
And I'll further conjecture that Brittany Murphy didn't know who Grigory Perelman was.
In before, I know a kick-ass D&D DM girl. The problem with stereotypes is that they don't describe the people but the population.
... that individual's or that village shop's account number and sort code (non-secrets; they can email it, tell you over the phone, publish it)
...
Tell that to Jeremy Clarkson http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7174760.stm
And how much of that CO2 was then absorbed by plants, into desserts, etc? Once it gets into the air doesn't mean it just stops so why do you end your math there?
It's all part of the Political Correctness movement. It started by convincing people certain words (gay, fagot, indian, handicapped, etc.) were at their very core evil (they use the word hateful because the word evil is also evil). It so happens I read the best definition of PC I have ever heard today. It was the winning submission to an annual contest (2007 if sources are accurate) Texas A&M holds to define popular terminology. It defines Political Correctness as:
"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional,
illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream
media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible
to pick up a turd by the clean end."
This story is kinda like getting arrested for yelling FIRE in a crowded parking lot full of empty cars next to a movie theater full of people.
1) unsubstantiated abstract factoid - check
2) pander to
3) car analogy - check
Profit!
It's bad enough that viewing child porn can throw you in prison for 20 years when most who view aren't interested in making it, which is the real crime.
By viewing you are creating a demand for it which someone will fill.
Incorrect. Fascism is simply a "third way" that is neither private ownership (capitalism) nor government ownership (communism), but instead private ownership with government CEOs pulling the strings. It's intended to prevent the abuses. It's also sometimes called corporatism.
That's the economic part of it. The political dimension is strong authoritarian and nationalist leadership and the strong being allowed to assert their superiority over the weak (social darwinism.) It's this latter part I was referring to, the idea some people are weak willed and should be lead not included.
I agree completely people shouldn't vote blindly but should know the issues. That's why personally I'm for mandatory voting. It's the only system that provides an incentive for all parties to make sure the populace is as informed as possible.
The proper philosophic stack for the right is (reason, individualism, capitalism).
Unfortunately, many on the right believe they can do (mysticism, altruism, capitalism) - but of course, that does not work.
Whoever decided that they should be called 'speech pathologists' didn't really think of the patients. 'Speech pathologist' actually quite a difficult thing to say.
That's not only slightly "OT." That is exactly the sort of thing an Occupational Therapist would say.
Once again, this isn't concerned with transfer of title
Yes, it is. Apple's attorneys would have an enormous uphill battle fighting against centuries of common law, precedent, and the Uniform Commerical Code to establish that title to those copies did not transfer at each step of the distribution chain from Apple to Psystar.
Did any of those transactions involve a signed lease indicating that the transaction was not a purchase at all, but rather a transferable lease to a copy that was owned by a third party?
Apple owns the copyright, not the copy. Nor do they have any basis for the claim that they have title to copies that they delivered indefinitely in exchange for good money upfront. Nor do they have a basis for the claim that a shrinkwrap "license" is an enforceable license that governs the use of something the customer already owns. No one needs a license to use a copy they own - unless Apple owns the copy they cannot set the terms of its use beyond what is regulated by copyright.
It is worth noting here that generally speaking a license can be retracted on demand. That is why it is a license, not a contract. If I say you can use my swimming pool, that is a license. If I change my mind, I revoke that license. Only if consideration is involved does that license become a contract. "Purchasing a license" is an oxymoron. So is "consideration free contract".
You are wrong. It's a model. It's working because it moves. Therefore, it's a working model train.
Models can be stationary, propelled by a tether, propelled by an external force, or self-propelled with onboard machinery. Examples of such models:
This model would fall under tethered.
A model is simply a reproduction of the original, generally on a miniature scale. There are no requirements for mobility or accuracy of internal machinery and external appearance to be called a model.
Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!