He was an absolute wingnut, but that doesn't mean he didn't make invaluable contributions to astrophysics, chemistry, mathematics and just science in general.

It worked for Thomas Edison.

Been there, seen that. Somehow, the goals below Director never got met, so there were no bonuses, but the Exec VPs somehow always met theirs and got nice checks.

For this, you win the Internets.

I work for a retail conglomerate who use IBM's POS systems and have for at least 30 years. It's not bad technology at all.

I didn't think Ben & Jerry even owned Ben & Jerry's anymore? I thought they got bought up by a conglomerate, like Burt's Bees being bought by Colgate.

I remember my first tab of acid.

The most evil Atomic X-ray Laserinator in the Tri-State Area!

But maybe Nokia and RIM could both salvage something if they merged. Not that Jim & Mike can grasp the reality in front of them.

Chapter 23: We're still on land.

I laughed out loud at this, thank you for making my morning happier.

The Fire is meant as a consumer device. Connected to the Amazon store. To read books, watch videos and/or movies, listen to music, read magazines, etc. It's not meant to compete with the iPad, and Bezos said that up front. Yes, it only has 8GB onboard storage. Most of the heavy stuff is meant to be streamed. You're not going to be storing mass amounts of data on it. And not all of us care in the least about jailbreaking it or cracking it or rootkitting it or any of that. That's not why we bought it.
I preordered one, got it, and I love it. The box it arrived in did not announce it was a Kindle Fire, it was in a normal Amazon box. I do agree, the lack of external volume controls is awkward. That being said, my 11yo stepson figured the thing out in about 10 minutes and loves it, too. No one that I've let play with it has accidentally powered it off. I have noticed sluggish touch-screen response, but nothing that keeps me from working or reading. Yes, the Amazon app store if limited, but I imagine it will grow modestly. For now, all the major apps that most normal people use are there and available.
I think the only people who were disappointed or mislead were expecting too much. They didn't read the details, they just saw "tablet for a lot less than iPad" and thought it would be something amazing. It's not amazing, but it is completely and totally adequate for what it is meant to do. Seriously, what are you expecting from a $199 device? That says up front that it is a media consumption device? Get real.

...aaaaand that's where you lost me. I may just have to go have a good cry over my Merriam-Webster Reference Desk Set.

Join the club, I have a wooden Panasonic that my mother bought in 1982 that is still going strong...after the 10 minutes or so it takes for the screen to "warm up". My 11 and 7 yo stepkids were amazed and horrified that it was my only TV when they first met me. The 11 yo sent pictures of it to his friends, calling it a "relic". It was heartwarming. His Samsung cellphone lasted exactly a year before dying. The TV still works. I just replaced my 25 yo Whirlpool fridge this year, but only because someone gave me a newer one for free. I gave the old one to my partner's employee and it's still working fine. I had to replace my 15 yo stove a couple years ago due to flood damage. The new GE stove I bought is a piece of junk, and was one of the nicer ones I picked from. It's depressing. I was raised to buy quality, and that you buy things to last. I don't understand our "disposable" culture, and I'm not sure I want to. My computer I built 7 years ago is still working just fine. My car is 7 years old and I'll drive it forever. The car I had before that, that I sold with 120k miles on it, is still being driven to the person I sold it to 7 years ago, and has close to 300k miles on it. Then you have people like my partner, who gets a new truck every two years just because he feels like it. It makes no sense to me. I blame Wal-Mart.

Because it is an excellent killer of things, and we're still afraid that Russia will weaponize it, or worse, sell it to China to be weaponized. That really scares me, because Putin, for all his megalomania, at least has a presence of mind that you can't play fast and loose with a risk like that. Hu, on the other hand, might as well pat Amnesty International on the head. They have plenty of cannon fodder to test on, and aren't bothered by pesky things like "ethics" and "human rights".