Comment Re:What are the bounds of property? (Score 1) 166
Good question, I'll look into that.
Good question, I'll look into that.
Go to Youtube and search for "Run from the Cure"
It seems marijuana cures most cancers and many other diseases.
Of course, this will never be official news due to the Medical Industry, the Government with their U.N. treaty against marijuana, the Media with their livelihood dependent on government and all the people who see it as "too good to be true" because they never heard it from a doctor, the government or the media.
Not actually medicine that makes you high, this comes from vegetative plants in the pre-flower stage. You can't patent marijuana, so the medical industry will never be producing this cure.
I'll mount an ass on my roof with a sign that says "Kiss This"
According to the UCC, the monster can use the land under jurisdiction of the Fed, meanwhile the land is part of the state. Not yours.
You can buy and sell value, but when it comes down to it, Eminent Domain, or Debt. can flick you like a flea at any point. You actually own shit. You use land.
The statement that you own land is a laymans perspective that isn't questioned often enough for the public to realize, that isn't the case.
The patent means the property stays in your name, cannot be judged against, confiscated or be part of Eminent Domain. Nor would it be subject to sale to satisfy your debts.
Groovy instrument!
LOL, if it actually got to court, good luck proving a damn thing.
Where's the drone? Ohhh , did you lose it somewhere? Musta downed it in some water somewhere. Tough shit!
As a designer of military weaponry, I predict you have wasted your money.
Wasn't actually talking about city property. If you live in the city, you don't expect privacy anyway.
If you want to take pictures at night, don't expect to see much.
I envision a sky filled with drones, armed drones downing camera drones, home radar systems, anti-drone EMP missles.
Necessity fuels the future.
Doesn't exist ANYMORE in the U.S.
The rest of it follows logically as my point.
No conspiracy theories needed. It hasn't been theory for years.
Peeping toms are bad, mmmkay? Left up to me, I'd put a deer rifle on ANY drone over my "Ponderosa", just to be sure.
Best to fly higher than I can shoot and take less detailed pictures. You don't need to SEE what's going on on my property. If you think you do, you don't.
If you come around looking for your missing drone, don't expect to make it home.
"How high above the dirt you USE". Deeds mean shit, you need a Land Patent to OWN land. Good luck attaining that.
You can own property if you have a Land Patent. Good luck getting one of those; like you said, the Supremes served their masters well.
I think flying above others property is fine, but once you begin taking photos clear enough to illuminate ones private life, you are as good as a peeping tom.
The last peeper I found outside my window, I put a small shovel across the back of his head, threw him in the trunk, drove him out of town a couple of counties and dumped his sorry ass after a good beating. I think that hunting drones over your property and the owner at the controls is perfectly acceptable. Righteous too.
Don't like it? Tough shit, think twice.
I agree with your post and would add; that people DO educate themselves via internet methods. Given their preferences, rather than being directed on a course of study to complete someones requirements to a path of employment, filled with information not wanted, therefore time wasted, people tend to learn the parts they need to complete the education they need, for the purpose at hand.
Youtube has enabled me to study many things, to my satisfaction, or at least put me on to the paths I need to attain my goals. I can count at least 4 fields of study I have indulged in, during the last 3 years or so. Without it, I wouldn't have had the time, money or resources to have done this.
I believe the Massive Open Online Courses are successful, but in a way they do not desire them to be. People filter out the parts they do not want. Schooling has always been a one-size-fits-all proposition. The self taught may have no degrees, but find success in their own ways by making their education work toward the ends they desire. This doesn't always involve working for someone else, which is a more desirable goal for the sort of people who make their own educations.
Perhaps the dissatisfaction with the Open Courses is; it isn't producing the drones that classical education does.
Sorry, I was still stuck on the claims of reliability in the first line of the article. Now my trousers are damp and I must change them.
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer