127561
submission
Dr. Damage writes:
Intel has released its most powerful CPU ever, the Core 2 Extreme QX6800, and The Tech Report compares it to 16 other processors, from AMD's Quad FX down to the cheapest dual-core. The CPUs are tested in 32- and 64-bit applications in Windows Vista x64, including Oblivion, Supreme Commander, Folding@Home in Linux, computational fluid dynamics, and power efficiency. Unsurprisingly, the QX6800 creams the competition.
103200
submission
Dr. Damage writes:
Intel and AMD have both showcased their high-end desktop quad-core solutions, but those are pricey and sometimes power-hungry. Both CPU makers offer arguably more attractive solutions that cost less and yet are more energy efficient. The Tech Report has tested that concept by pitting five quad-core desktop configs against one another, including the less expensive Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Athlon 64 FX-70. The tests include benchmarks in 64-bit Vista, Folding@Home in Linux, and a novel way of measuring the energy used to render a scene.
30609
submission
Bender writes:
Just months after releasing its Core 2 Duo processors and taking back the performance crown, Intel has managed to squeeze two of them into a single socket to make the world's first quad-core CPU. The Tech Report has done a full work-up comparing the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 against the fastest dual-core CPUs from AMD and Intel. The tests include power consumption and Folding@Home performance. The quad-core CPU scores highest in each, though in one case that's good and in another bad.
18631
submission
Dr. Damage writes:
The Tech Report has taken an in-depth look at Quad SLI, Nvidia's insane four-GPU solution for extreme gaming graphics. The article explains how load balancing is handled between four GPUs, why OpenGL works better than DirectX for Quad SLI, and how SLI antialiasing achieves 16X and 32X sample sizes. They've also tested Quad SLI against 22 different graphics solutions at a range of settings, exposing Quad SLI's surprising performance and image quality shortfalls in the process.
14835
submission
Bender writes:
The idea of Windows Vista's Aero interface using a graphics processor to deliver eye candy on the desktop seems like a fun one at first glance, but what happens when you run it on a high-end graphics card with lots of power draw and a loud blower? Will the Vista Aero GUI make your PC go all Dustbuster on you? TR has tested that possibility with a range of graphics cards, and the initial answer looks better than expected.
13661
submission
Dr. Damage writes:
Last week's Intel Developer Forum didn't produce any major announcements because it wasn't focused on imminent new products. But quietly, in a number of small ways, we saw something further off, but more significant, coalesce: the future of Intel CPU technology is increasingly about highly parallel floating-point processing, whether it be via multicore processors, SSE4, application-specific accelerators, new types of coprocessors, or massively parallel chips with huge 'tiles' of execution resources offering teraflops of power for scientific computing, multimedia, physics, or — Intel appears to be especially sweet on this one — graphics. Could future tera-scale CPUs challenge GPUs for dominance?
6617
submission
Dr. Damage writes:
Nvidia's GeForce 7950 GT graphics card debuts today with the same old story: it's cheaper, faster, and better than the card it replaces. All of this would be the usual good news were it not for the fact that XFX's version of the 7950 GT comes with completely fanless passive cooling. The Tech Report has a full review of this intriguing beast, complete with power consumption and noise level tests against a broad array of single and multi-GPU setups.
