In addition using they/their in a singular fashion is considered to be improper use by many in grammar.

I've heard the same said about passive voice, and starting a novel by describing the weather. I'm not in the habit of following rules off cliffs. Until the prescriptivists who insist that singular they/their as a gender-neutral pronoun come up with a better alternative, they're welcome to kiss my fat New Yorker ass.

I'll post any way I please, SharpFang, but I haven't posted as AC in this thread. Try to pay attention.

AC, I don't agree with MikeRT, either, but he's entitled to his opinion. You really aren't helping.

Because their logic is that if you use any gender specific pronouns you are, by default, misogynistic?

I thought their logic was that using the male pronoun for persons of unknown gender or in contexts where gender ought to be irrelevant is both unnecessary and sexist - even if it used to be standard usage. How hard is it to use they/their instead of he/his? I manage it easily enough.

I'm not quite hardcore enough for Xmonad, mainly because I don't feel like dealing with Haskell at the moment. However, I'm looking into AwesomeWM now that I finally took the plunge and switched from debian-based distros to Arch Linux, and I configured Openbox to maximize (within the margin) all non-dialogue windows and strip off the decor, which makes Openbox act enough like a tiler to work on a laptop screen.

Dude, you have no business being a snob. You're still using a stacking window manager. Come back when you've learned to use a tiling WM like Awesome, i3, Xmonad, etc.

Personally, I think Google is backing Medium as a way to get all of the "creative/literary nonfiction" writers off of Google+ so they can appeal to the Fecebook/Shitter demographic.

I'd rather hire Duke Togo. :)

Notice what I said about political will? The US government hasn't had the balls to enforce existing antitrust statutes since they went after Microsoft in the late 1990s. IMHO, any corporation that's "too big to fail" should be an antitrust target. Also, Comcast, because fuck those clowns. :)

The only natural right people have is the right to a life that's solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. At least, that's what Thomas Hobbes thought, but he had survived a nasty civil war. Funny thing about rights: they don't seem to exist until enough people agree that they do, and choose to honor them. That suggests they're an artifact of consensus reality, rather than physical reality.

Otherwise, an atheist living in Saudi Arabia could invoke the right to freedom of religion and not get beheaded for not worshiping the demon Allah. Better to be an atheist living in the US, where you're still free to reject the demon Yahweh and his weakling of an only begotten son.

I'll support small government if and only if it has the authority and political will to dissolve corporations for malfeasance. A small government that doesn't crack down on corporations is just privatizing tyranny.

Seriously. It would fit right in there, and Bennett would probably find a more appreciative audience.

Corporations are not people. Corporations are property. The government has the authority to tax property.

Instead, government serves the corporations.

And yes, governments do have the right to tax you.

They have the authority, granted by law, but not the right. Only individual people have rights.