I think you mean, "Hmm live with high taxes or live where people push their bias, instead of mine, into the school books..."
More like "Hmm live with high taxes or live where people intentionally push their bias into the school books..."
Everyone has biases, and they are bound to make their way into the books. But when a group of people who have no business messing with textbooks in the first place go in with an agenda, that is a problem
Where's any actual data that supports your assertion that the USA innovates more because it's more right-leaning?
Thank you for saying it.
I always thought we were more 'innovative' because of how open we were to new ideas, peoples and because of our capitalistic system.
No, I am glad he did.
I mean, it was pretty obvious that this dude was not a "Middle aged white man in his 40s," but at the time, that ALL the authorities had to go on. The media went crazy with it as they are wont too, but that does not change the facts
The irony here is that you do not realize that you are guilty of the bias that you readily accuse of.
I thought the Bush years were full of people spouting BS to validate themselves, but that is nothing compared to the Obama years.
Because that is what Ubuntu is striving for and it has been pretty obvious from the start.
If you do not like it(as I do not), I suggest you use one of other billion distros out there or fork Ubuntu(I already see a 'pure' version happening anyway)
He wouldn't have to; a Dem would do it.
Correction: He would not, period. A Dem would certainly do it though.
No. His argument makes perfect sense. Perhaps he is not completely mindful of scope, but the basics apply. We are all expected to do our jobs 'perfectly' with little to no mistakes, the more 'important' your job is to society, the more is demanded of you.
Sure we are not perfect, but perfection will always be demanded of us and we have to do our best.
*Goes back to spanking his monkey*
This is how you wind up with idiots surrounded by yes-men in charge.
So just about every leading body and government ever?
I've always liked the formulation "the fitter *tend* to survive" rather than "survival of the fittest". You might be the fittest human being that ever lived, but if a boulder falls on your testicles before you have a chance to successfully breed, it's pretty damned irrelevant.
Semantics. *Tries not to link to poster's earlier comments*
You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken