Have you used a motorola phone? If the next nexus is a moto, the other OEMs might get a sales boost...

Because most people have already purchased huge numbers of apps and, if they can get use out of them on another platform, why not?

Am I the only one who can't wait to give Win8 a shot just to see what all the screaming is about? I haven't touched the interface at all and only know what I've seen in pictures, but usually something as polarizing as metro ends up being awesome in the long run or it gets completely ditched. I'm excited to decide which one I think it is....

The internet is a "little closed world?"

Why is reading a crappy magazine in the doctor's office more productive than using your smartphone? I hate when people spew opinions like this without showing at least ONE piece of data/evidence that using a smartphone is more harmful than the alternative (the other things we do when we're bored).

And didn't people make the same arguments about television? And then, later, about videogames?

From TFA:

"The star was likely formed in the stellar ring and later thrown into its highly eccentric orbit though a close encounter with one or more stars in the ring. The stars exchanged momentum and the red dwarf was tossed onto a new, deadly trajectory. "

So, even though they're calling it an "orbit," it was likely not on this trajectory before and this is the first time it's getting close enough to the black hole for the disc to be affected. Also, the disc is already being destroyed: "But the damage is already happening. The protoplanetary disk is disintegrating under the black hole's tidal pull -- stretching the disk like taffy. Add to that a withering blast of ultraviolet radiation from the black hole that is heating and driving off material in the disk."

Who cares if it charges a little faster than the previous Tesla? It doesn't even have NFC.

Hopefully they remember to upgrade my area to 3G first... Paying the same price for everyone else for edge speeds is getting old.

I realize you're probably saying this as a joke, but I can face-unlock all of my brother's android devices and we don't like particularly similar as far as brothers go...

PS I probably should have said "the current administration's" VERSION of net neutrality. I don't want anyone to think my comment meant I'm anti-net neutrality, just that I think the net neutrality policy in place isn't even worthy of that name.

Is this your first election? I'm not trying to be a smart-a$$, just pointing out that this is almost always the strategy when going up against the incumbent. It's much safer to try and make the incumbent look bad than to try and convince others that his own policies are any better.

I took it as him calling Obama's version of net neutrality a "solution looking for a problem," not net neutrality in general. Am I wrong here? I could have mis-interpreted it.

Unfortunately, it is hard to find anything controversial or interesting in these answers, which is to be expected when political teams are given time to craft PC responses to questions like these. Everything here is what you would expect - Obama answers the questions by talking up his policies of the past 4 years and Mitt answers the questions by attacking Obama's policies of the past 4 years. I would much rather see these questions posed in a debate, where the candidates have less time and less help in coming up with responses.

I agree with you. However, the Democrats' "view" of the issue does not match their policies. I'm no Mitt fan, but he is right on when he attacks the current administration/FCC's net neutrality policy.

They chose to do it because it works and it's profitable. Direct your ire at the patent and court systems.