You can see it with any re-runs. I know one channel, WGN, that airs Futurama episodes and always has three or four entire scenes missing, plus several more punchlines edited out. I also suspect that hour prime-time shows have recently added another short commercial break in the final five/ten minutes of show.

You don't remember even "killer app" being tossed about by reviewers?

Why, then the entire state would be represented by the handful that votes on principle...and since they wouldn't collude to consensus, it would be fairer than the electoral college.

This thread is stupid from the get-go. If there is any issue they bring up, you ask for a provisional ballot and fill that shit out.

You then have more time to clear up the problem!

Good thing computers don't have terrible algebra skills like girls do!

I bet those ancient structures' longevity has absolutely nothing to do with the competence and regularity of people maintaining it.

Austin PD would never ruin my bong shelter.

I understand how a popular vote works, but not how an Elector's mind works. Maybe we should talk about vote fraud/tabulation being a problem after we actually get access to influence the election.

What's the difference? Cameras can have extremely high resolutions, digital zoom levels, and parabolic microphones. So they can indeed film you right in your face, and record a quiet conversation, remotely. Would you rather see the cameraman walk up to you, or never know he's there?

Have any examples of mass killing in the name of atheism?

If the server must do more arithmetic for transmission, is it more susceptible to denial of service attacks?

Would they also check for, say, a Google Play paid app that had been cracked and manually installed? That fits some definition of malware.

By the same logic, every humanitarian foundation also has a vested interest in preserving human suffering and disease. Every mechanic, doctor, technician, developer, or whatever profession that is paid to fix things should be intentionally not fixing them to maximize profit, yes?

So why do any of these things work?

Is there a useful purpose you have in mind other than deterrence that is achieved when one is punished?

If the entirety of the losing side has wasted their votes because they lost afterward, then obviously voting doesn't work because whomever still does vote would win.

Oh...wait...I guess hindsight doesn't qualify you to place different values on anyone's votes...