Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment We don't need browsers for this, we need APIs (Score 1) 185

The idea of building a custom browser for utilizing websites doesn't really fit into the web.

The future of web clients is the ability to use APIs from custom javascript.. Don't build custom UIs around these services as a 'browser'.

If the service you provide doesn't offer an API? .. well. Good luck with that. Someday someone will and people will fondly recall your service as that thing people used to use.

Comment Re:LibreOffice will join the ranks of Linux... (Score 1) 500

Kind of a FUD response. The alternative of not being able to fork is that we would be at the mercy of whoever's software we're running. In this case Oracle, and for lack of an alternative office suite, Microsoft.

While it's an inconvenient reality that anyone can do whatever they want with a fork, cream does rise to the top. If you feel strongly about it, donate some money to the organization or your time.

Simply sitting on the sidelines complaining about what you'd do differently or better or really -- what you think everyone else does wrong.. Thats a luxury you have because of open source.

Without open source you'd simply be complaining about Microsoft not doing what you want.

Comment Re:"Your Rights Online"? (Score 1) 70

Take any person you consider 'brilliant' and do a bit of digging on what makes them brilliant. You'll probably find they have a wide breadth of knowledge outside their focus area. The other thing you'll find is that by absorbing new ideas that you get new perspective on your old ideas by being able to make connections between seemingly disparate concepts or see patterns in your old ideas by seeing them through a new lense.

So, while you see this as 'money wasted on crap', I think it's a good idea. Take people out of their element, stimulate their minds with new ideas. There's no harm that can come from this, only benefit.

The argument that money is wasted on art or music education always strikes me as myopic.

Comment I do not think so. (Score 1) 255

The reason nobody should buy a social networking website is that the barrier for entry is a college kid who knows PHP -- and thats only if you want to be 'as good' as the competition.

You can buy a social networking site, but when the next big thing comes along and all the users you bought jump ship don't say I didn't warn you.

Rupert Murdoch spent $580m on myspace, how good is that working out for him?

Comment Re:Control (Score 1) 417

I don't see why. There's no financial benefit to charging people to develop for the desktop. It reduces the number of developers and the availability of third-party software.

They had an opportunity to _keep_ things full closed source when moving from OS.9 to OSX but instead chose to go with an open source kernel and build the system foundation on open source.. So, the genie was in the bottle and they intentionally let it out.

They didn't even have to let the genie out, mach kernel is BSD licensed. They could have kept the whole thing closed source.

Either way, hate on Apple all you want. Doesn't bother me.

Comment Re:Control (Score 3, Insightful) 417

If everything back in the day was as closed as Steve Jobs wants it to be now, do you think we geeks could have learned so much ourself? Just to code some simple hello world application you would have needed to buy a "coding" license from Apple. Not really feasible for a 10 year old kid who is just starting to learn programming.

Hmm. Apple provides XCode and examples for free, installs perl, python, and a variety of other programming languages for free by default..

I think you might be mistaken about what Steve Jobs is trying to control. The handset market? Sure.The desktop market? .. Not as much as you'd like to lead us to believe.

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...