It does support HTML, however: ñ

Yes, yes - in that case. That's because Apple Computer got into the music business. I just picked it as an easy example. But it's possible for two companies to have trademarks for the same name in different fields.

"You can do it, we can help"
Trademarked by Nicorette Gum

"You can do it, we can help"
Trademarked by Home Depot

The same trademark but used in two different fields

I wasn't talking about the metaphor. I was talking about walking up to an actual front door - where previous poster seriously thought that stepping onto someone else's property is already trespassing in all cases.

If nothing else to this point has convinced us to use .us, nothing will. We have .com and the only people using .us are public schools, it seems.

Besides, some trademarks only cover a geographic region or a type of product (Apple Records vs. Apple Computer). Some names just aren't unique enough to be granted nationwide usage.

And it's not even an unlocked door. It's a lock door with the key taped to the front of the door. So you still have to break-in to trespass. I don't know if that's a requirement for it being a violation of the CFAA or not.

Prison workers are cheaper than H1B workers. Maybe there's a nefarious patriotic plot behind all this.

No kidding. Back when computers were on display and you could actually touch and play with them, I loved setting the start menu font color to the same as the background color. Same to the menus. And since they didn't know what to do about it, it would still be that way weeks later.

But without needing a password, it's not a violation of CFAA is it?

Not in most states. People can reasonably expect to be able to walk up to your front door unless you have posted signs saying "no trespassing" or "no soliciting" or told the specific person that they are not allowed.

Pushing a photo through an open door isn't really trespassing either if you stay outside.

Depends on where you live. Putting flyers on the door knob is only trespassing if you have already told them not to be there, put up a no trespassing sign, or put up a no soliciting sign in most places. Otherwise, people can reasonably expect to be able to walk up to your front door.

Pushing a photo through an open door isn't really trespassing either if you stay outside.

Not pointless, just optimized for overcrowded urban areas who likely are just as cheap to run fiber to anyway.

That's sad. Frontier rolled out tons of DSL to way out in the rural middle of nowhere in Southern Illinois. I think they stopped rollout, but I know people who are 10 miles from town who have good quality DSL. I think they are the only phone company around here that has DSLAMs anywhere but the CO. AT&T definitely doesn't run fiber or power to remote DSLAMs. Or even fix their rotting copper.

If I were your dad, I'd get one of those cordless phone systems that will bluetooth to your cell phone. Put the base station and an older cell phone on a charger in the attic that still has an external antenna port on it. Put a GSM antenna outside of the house wired to it. Tada, you have cordless phones in your house that at least receive calls over cellular. Don't know if they can send. It would take a more complicated solution to do that (I know asterisk has chan_bluetooth).

But if you live in the right neighborhood, cable wins out because nobody is using the bandwidth but you. It's only a matter of time, but I'm happy for now.

That would be relevant if they were quoting the article where the reporter says that. Click through and read. The word penetrate doesn't appear in the article.

This was the summary writer using quotation marks for emphasis of some sort. If they were quoting something, we don't know from where.

Wow, so getting scammed by former co-workers is easy. As is anyone who knows how to Google LinkedIn.