The only thing required to make either one a "true" CLI is that there be a command line that lets you interface with things. It does not have to be a core piece of the OS to fit the definition. Otherwise, you could say that Linux distros don't have a true GUI.
So any DNS you use could do this.
But they actually own an ad network to put the data to use.
There are only two possible real world outcomes:
1) people will re-enable HTTP administration and start sending their passwords cleartext on their LANs
2) the very people in companies who do security work will be running outdated browsers, on purpose, to connect to their gear.
What about
3) Create a trusted MITM proxy for all these devices. Browsers only see the higher-security proxy.
He's providing a service- buying up generic phrases so that businesses are forced to actually use creativity and not use a boring name. Not a very profitable thing, since nobody should buy them.
16:36:25Z
So you bought it? Have fun with it. It's your money.
No, it's retroactive. From the first flight, their tanks will be gaining fuel in midair - making up fuel lost in the last 100 years without this coating.
Liar:
Whois Server Version 2.0
Domain names in the
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net/
for detailed information.
No match for "CONCRETEBALLOONANIMALS.COM".
>>> Last update of whois database: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:46:12 GMT <<<
No. They didn't even start using the phrase or trademark it until 2015. And it's not cybersquatting if there's no target buyer. So renewals don't even factor into it.
But their lawyer saw an opportunity to waste their clients money and make some in the process.
I can read it just fine - but it does appear to be designed for much lower DPI screens (1024x768 @ 17"). So the design is probably over a decade old.
Do you know how zoom works?
There's no such thing as an interface where you can type commands? There are two available (Command Prompt and Powershell). Whether they are any good or not doesn't change their name.
it could be easily rewritten to refer to people who are or were recently pregnant
That is still very gender-biased. Single fathers deserve equal protection for the parts that don't involve pregnancy - if any even do.
The Bible itself doesn't really condone slavery, it just tells slaves how to be faithful. The mere existence of slavery in the day doesn't mean support. Not going to get into the rest right now.
There are a lot of other laws and programs that are still gender separated, such as WIC. It'll be interesting to see if any more are challenged on the same basis.
Also, when the 14th Amendment was passed in 1868, homosexual behavior was a felony in every state in the union. So I am guessing you are going to sit there and tell me that they wrote this amendment they were going to allow same sex marriage - then throw them in prison after saying "I do" ?
Well, you'd have to wait a little longer than that. A chaste marriage would still have been legal in that scenario.
"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe
