It's more like the system was likely so badly put together that the data wasn't relational or optimized in almost any way. Not to say that NoSQL isn't a mess for this situation, but I can hardly imagine it was much less of a mess before.

By the extension of that first thought, it means you can turn a distro into either desktop or server versions by removing the pieces that do one thing well and adding others.

I posted this reply to the wrong place the first time. So here I go again:

No - anyone who knows anything about subject matter involved in a trial (computers, forensics, medicine, etc.) will be excluded from the jury during the selection process with the attorney's. You're supposed to have people who will only listen to the "expert witness" and not use your own knowledge. It's a certain guarantee that this skews the jury pool toward people a little dumber than you'd want.

No - anyone who knows anything about subject matter involved in a trial (computers, forensics, medicine, etc.) will be excluded from the jury during the selection process with the attorney's. You're supposed to have people who will only listen to the "expert witness" and not use your own knowledge. It's a certain guarantee that this skews the jury pool toward people a little dumber than you'd want.

That would only make sense if the criminal didn't deserve to be prosecuted. You can't fix the problem post-hoc.

And you think that's the only way to gather intelligence illegally? I still might guess parallel construction, but my mind didn't jump to the NSA. There are plenty of other options out there.

Go ahead, build a browser that doesn't support the video tag. Let the ad networks fall back to Flash. Wait, do any ad networks actually use the video tag yet?

It's animation at 15fps (cartoon). The video might nominally be 30fps, but the lack of actual motion between frames would be compressed away. They also said full motion. They didn't say it wasn't the size of a postage stamp.

Habit is a strong force. And programs still list it higher on the default outputs list. The space savings isn't always that great without using a tool like pngcrush, which is just a lot of extra work that nobody really bothers with.

...in 1986. I suppose it could have gone almost 30 years without being discovered after being collected. The question is why.

Things buried in landfills break down slower. Kind of makes the whole idea of having landfills seem silly, but it's true.

You're assuming they're only counting the 3 years at the beginning of life. What about the 10 years at the end of their life?

So are all 8,000 diapers used before any end up in a landfill? That is one crazy hoarder.

It's only as ambiguous as terrible writing.

Actually, no. Why wouldn't any diapers end up in the landfill until all 8,000 are used? Everything about the sentence structure is awkward and confusing.

More concerning is that the baby takes centuries to break down.