Comment Re:Yo dawg, I heard (Score 4, Insightful) 840
It is the word of two against the word of one. What makes his word worth more than theirs?
Innocent until proven guilty.
It is the word of two against the word of one. What makes his word worth more than theirs?
Innocent until proven guilty.
The AC is a straw man. Real "info wants to be free" people only want the info of companies, organizations, governments, etc. to be free. Julian Assange himself watches his own privacy very carefully.
The companies that make these things are interested in interoperability, price, and security theater. Note that real security isn't on that list.
You don't understand. Citizendium's own policies actively promote pseudoscience in many areas.
If you're working with folders then symlinks are probably okay; if you're working with files a hard link may be the best of both worlds.
2. Hire real experts, real writers, professional editors. Toss the agenda-driven wankers and college kids.
Sanger tried that. It didn't work. Doesn't mean he hasn't given up yet. (NB: RationalWiki is NOT affiliated with Wikipedia; it was started as a response to Conservapedia (a large group of nutjobs with a wiki, also unaffiliated with Wikipedia)).
Wait.. we can block kdawson??
/me checks
Yes!
Signed, Arthur XXII, King of Britain and Jupiter.
Well, I didn't vote for you!
Exactly, that's how democracy works. Oh, wait a minute, he's a king! Arthur! Get off that throne!
Sony has lots of lawyers and you don't. If you asked to suspend sales of the PS3 until "the legality is decided", Sony would sue you for damages.
I believe they do, but I don't have a link to back that up.
IIRC the DMCA only applies to user-produced content. Drudge posts everything himself, so he's not subject to the safe-harbor at all.
IANAL, TINLA, I might be wrong.
Second, there are penalties for bringing a lawsuit with not basis. See rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Frivolous litigation is unrelated to what everyone else it talking about (listing frivolous damages in an otherwise non-frivolous lawsuit).
If you don't like it, then don't read Politics stories.
They are simply posting details about past things that the mainstream press conveniently "forgot" to tell us.
Interestingly enough, The NY Times has decided it doesn't like WikiLeaks. I would post a link, but they want a login (it's currently in the opinion section, where it belongs, but it may be archived eventually).
With your bare hands?!?