I understand your point of view, but why do you feel this is owed by the insurance company? The insurance company owes the policyholder indemnity, and that is, the cost to repair the vehicle. The policyholder has the ultimate say who does the repair. The insurance company paid for an OE airbag replacement. The shop (most likely) unknowingly put the counterfeit in. It is between the owner of the vehicle and the body shop at that point.

Here is the link. http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/UIKit/Reference/UIView_Class/UIView/UIView.html%23//apple_ref/occ/instp/UIView/autoresizingMask

If you are talking about iOS as I believe you are, that is not true. See mccodemonkey's post above. iOS has supported dynamic positioning since iOS 2.

I am considering deleting G+ but the one thing holding me back is the fear Picasa will be affected. Has yours been affected in any way? Have ANY other services been affected?

If by simplifying editing procedures you mean getting rid of the untouchable wiki nazi admins, there may be hope still.

Perfect example of gaming the Amazon review system. Product has only one review, by a user which only has 2 reviews, both for the same product and company.

Facebook.com first, then user@facebook.com user@google.com, then came Google+ So the question is, do you really want your e-mail address to be integrated with your social site?

Rather than addressing individual apps/con jobs, you'd rather apply a blanket rule over all. How can that possibly go wrong?

Honestly if you think that you can buy yourself the ability to track the location of ANY cell phone, arbitrarily, for a mere 1.99, I suppose it is completely out of the question to expect such an individual to actually read the description of something he is about to pay for. Apple is not acting unprofessional here. The app is clearly marked as a prank, functions as a prank and does everything outlined in a make-believe fashion. And here comes government to save the idiots from themselves.

Who says prank apps have to be free? You are free to charge whatever for whichever app. Whether or not you will have buyers is another matter.

While it tries hard, the disclaimer could not be more clear. What happened to personal responsibility?

FTFA:

The brouhaha started when local users complained that an iPhone app called Super Cell Phone Tracker, which they bought online from the Apple's App Store for US$1.99, did not work at all and there was no way they could ask for a refund. According to the App Store description, the tracker program is a joke and intended only for fun. However, not all buyers read the description before downloading the software.

If you take a look at poorly rated similar prank apps, the reviews are trife with "this doesn't work, I got ripped off" even though the app description clearly states it's a prank, oftentimes in the first sentence.

RICE = race inspired cosmetic enhancement Also, this is my very first post on Slashdot after years of lurking. Yay me.