Comment Re:What is it? (Score 1) 191
Like the Nintendo DS / DSi / 3DS? Or the other decades-old touch screen devices I already own?
Why is this news? The resistive touch screen has been around for ages, and it's still superior to capacitive trash.
Like the Nintendo DS / DSi / 3DS? Or the other decades-old touch screen devices I already own?
Why is this news? The resistive touch screen has been around for ages, and it's still superior to capacitive trash.
Because there is NO lawful justification for interfering with the band in such a manner.
Of course there is. They're not permitted to use their radio equipment in an unlawful manner
They aren't. And if they were, that doesn't grant someone else the hijack the airwaves in retaliation.
Yup!
They had no need to divert the planes, they were just pissed someone dared to watch public officials doing their jobs, so they decided to not do their jobs and rob the guy.
Scientists would love to go to the moon, build a telescope, and use it there.
You keep saying that and you keep being fucking wrong.
Crimea was part of Russia before they "invaded".
Hawaii was legally annexed.
This may sound preposterous, if you're a retard.
The Cat should make short work of the piled-up rocks, and the high-pressure hoses would be ready in case the demonstrators start throwing anything.
Now that science itself is under attack, we need to be prepared to defend it.
The scoops are coming. The scoops are coming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Rant away. What the fuck else is Slashdot for?
Just because someone is self desecrating and a walking slab of lard does not mean they don't have a valid argument. Your logic is fallacious.
Sure it does, when their "argument" is about how things must not be desecrated. Judging by everything you've posted on this page, I can only assume you yourself are "self desecrating and a walking slab of lard".
Your logic, and your grammar, is fuckdingoretardedbad.
Of course it wasn't Russia's "acquisition" of Crimea was perfectly legal. It belonged to Russia already. The separation from Russia was illegal.
Another compromise.
The Telescope goes up, but the Washington Monument gets bulldozed, or perhaps the Salt Lake Temple, or the Statue of Liberty. If not just US things then perhaps the Vatican, Ankor Wat, or other religious icons.
Wait.... what is that..... it makes a difference when the things YOU value are under attack.
Makes no difference to me. I'd love to see the Statue of Liberty shipped off from New Jersey (because it's truly in New Jersey) back to Frnace.
I'd be delighted to see Mount Rushmore obliterated back to a boring old rock. We don't need fucking pointless structures and monuments to stupid shit.
Considering they would have all been Japanese by now if it weren't for the evil Americans, I think they should sit the fuck down, shut the fuck up, stop believing in retarded volcano gods, and maybe strum a ukelele.
In the old days they used to be able to pay off some local leaders to make the resistance go away. Now, they're absolutely bending over backwards, funding education initiatives, etc, and the protestors won't go away. Why? Two reasons. First, they made the mistake of breaking ground on a day that drew more attention because the activists were also doing something that day. Second, with Twitter and the internet the True Believers don't need local leaders to stir them up and connect them, they can do it themselves.
Basically, they're trying to placate a bunch of implacable Luddites and Fanatics who won't be placated. Nothing but complete surrender or martyrdom will satisfy them.
It's infuriating.
Luddites? Maybe they need more apps.
Dedicated routers offer same-or-better performance and capacity of a "layer 3 switch", and give you FULL layer 3 traffic control, not the half-assed firewalling, prioritization, etc. that "layer 3 switches" provide (at slow fucking speed).
"Layer 3 Switch" is a marketing term for "half-assed router", and nothing more. If they were as capable as routers they'd be called routers because they'd fucking be routers. It's just like "smart managed switch", which means you get a semi-functional web interface (and maybe a semi-functional serial interface), good enough to do basic filtering, authentication, and VLANing, but it's no where near as capable as a true managed switch.
Saying a layer 3 switch is better than a router is like saying a spork is better than a spoon, fork, and knife.
A "layer 3 switch" has minimal routing features and is only a "great router" if you don't need to do much routing and thus don't want to spend money on an actual router.
It is a router that can *route* packets among all interfaces at full speed. Get a Linux box with 16 NICs and flood them with traffic. See it sizzling, smoking and crashing.
Oh fuck off with that bullshit. Routing packets takes minimal CPU, so fuck off with your sizzling and smoking horse shit. Full fledged routers are much more capable than "layer 3 switches".
Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!
