Comment Re:Bad Summary, Only new part is the sharing optio (Score 1) 487
Mad cuz bad? Yeah, mad cuz bad.
Fuck off retard.
Mad cuz bad? Yeah, mad cuz bad.
Fuck off retard.
FROSTY PISS
<SUBJECT> IS FOR COWS YOU ARE ALL COWS MOO
HAPPY <DAY OF WEEK> FROM THE GOLDEN GIRLS
There's not a chance in hell that "myhouse_optout_nomap" would work.
You can either do "myhouse_optout" OR "myhouse_nomap". And they'll still ignore your preference.
And if you give your wifi credentials to a guest who needs access to your network, they can opt you in without your permission or even your knowledge.
They could also shout it from a mountaintop. There's no _optout option for that.
Would you say a financially comfortable american with terminal cancer is 'better off' than 99% of the world?
Yes I would.
Seriously, if you have enough cash and connections to even think about starting a company, or even doing one of these new-fangled "startups", then you're better off than 95% of the country and better of than 99% of the world.
Might want to look up every single failed "Edutainment" attempt in history.
I'm guessing you've never taught something to someone in an effective manner.
Very soon after Minecraft launched, we noticed teachers bringing the game into their classrooms
Often inspired by the passion of their students, they started using Minecraft to design history lessons, teach language classes, explore mathematics, physics, computer science, writing, and more.
Bullshit, bullshit, and more bullshit. I don't doubt that teachers have in fact used Minecraft for these things, but they're certainly not designing lessons, teaching classes, or exploring subjects. They're faffing about with Minecraft and the students don't benefit from it.
Testing, let alone QA testing or MORE testing, is NOT the Google way.
Assholes as a Service
because the topics mentioned aren't opinions, they are facts - there is no room for someone to have an opinion on whether "the Earth is getting warmer mostly due to human activity" for instance. Either it is, or it isn't, and facts overwhelmingly point to yes.
It isn't.
command.com and cmd.exe are different, both are NOT DOS, and both are NOT Windows.
PowerShell isn't a core part of Windows (yet) and doesn't have anywhere near the coverage necessary to be a true CLI.
These things may be CLIs, but they are not "Windows CLI". There is no "Windows CLI". idbeholda has no idea what he's doing. He seems to think running pulling some strings from some cmd.exe commands let him create strong, hardware-locking DRM.
There is no "Windows CLI". I even told you that when I said "(Hint - there is no such thing.)".
Windows is a GUI. Windows does not have a CLI. The CLI you are referring to is a faked, extended DOS environment (to various degrees of fakeness depending on your version and bitness of Windows, cmd.exe vs. command.com, etc. ).
It is not Windows. Windows has PowerShell now, but it's not a core part of the OS.
In short, Windows does NOT have a true CLI.
Uh, no.
The value of Widget A reflects its potential use as a component in Widget B.
The value of something is never anything more than the sum of the value of the raw materials and labor required to make it. The price is another matter.
Voodoo economics like the shit you just spewed are exactly why we're fucked deep into an abyss of debt while doing an inflationary spiral.
"Look! There! Evil!.. pure and simple, total evil from the Eighth Dimension!" -- Buckaroo Banzai
