Don't underestimate the fumes though.

Also Line 3997, 64k is a large request. If you're using a hardened form of malloc, the memory you allocated for the incoming message would initially be blank, and the next page of memory wouldn't exist. So the 64k read from the incoming buffer is likely to trap and crash the process.

Line 3991, that's the user supplied payload length, so it could be 64K even though the user only supplied a 1 byte message, and it doesn't cause a write outside allocated data..

With default compile options, that's effectively Push(), Pop(). So obviously they aren't testing with all permutations of "supported" options.

SSL adds at least one extra network round trip, more if you aren't careful. Of course that makes your website slower. But that has little to do with CPU load.

Or just 10,000 sperm samples. One natural kid, and one from storage each generation.

And they basically designed it for their own niche market. So you're not wrong.

If you just want a laptop, this isn't for you. Think of it as a portable workstation with FPGA and other features for rapid hardware prototyping and hacking.

Personally I think it would be more usable with the traditional clamshell design. Right off the bat, you're going to need another layer of protection for the screen and somewhere to store a keyboard before you can consider lugging this thing around.

> git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]

You're welcome.

If you took your balance out of MtGOX, sure. But how many people had a cash or bitcoin balance held by them that didn't actually exist? A balance they now cannot recover? MtGOX is certainly negligent, but if they suspected that the cash didn't exist and ignored it while continuing to pay out, that's fraud and practically a Ponzi scheme.

That's exactly what a Ponzi scheme is. Fraud, claiming that you are making money when you aren't, and paying out people from the money contributed by new investors.

The latest mars rover didn't know how to drive when it landed. And now it doesn't know how to land. Sometimes it a matter of reducing the amount of software that can go wrong, or just trying to save memory.

Classifying something as a Ponzi scheme, usually involves outright fraud. ie someone is claiming that there is a huge pile of cash somewhere that doesn't actually exist.

There may be individuals committing fraud using bitcoin. And bitcoin may be a speculative asset bubble with very similar outcomes to a Ponzi scheme. But it isn't *technically* a Ponzi scheme.

I had to stand up and recite times tables in classes, and I could usually do so flawlessly. But I didn't memorise them. Since they were recited in order I had plenty of time to calculate the answers in my head [n * x = (previous value)+x].

Make take on this survey; the kids who are really bright, don't need help at home.