Well, not really, since there are other GPLv2 apps on the store
citation needed.
Or you could use 1/7 = 0.142857142857... Or 1/11 = 0.090909090909... From here you can probably convince them that ANY rational can be written exactly as a recurring decimal (as 10^k-1 is divisible by k for all k)...
Doh, that's not quite right, but you get the idea.
XBMC comes to the iPad originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:07:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | XBMC |Email this|CommentsContinue reading XBMC comes to the new Apple TV, we go hands-on (video)
XBMC comes to the new Apple TV, we go hands-on (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | |Email this|CommentsSome folk don't necessarily fit that mold. In the case of a large refactor project, forking may well be the better way to go. I'm sure if the fork is successful then the changes will be considered by the parent project. If not, they definitely have a problem.
Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach