I sort of feel like: Wow, the US develops and pays for this cool new thing called the Internet. They open it up to the world and do at least a pretty good job of not being too political about it. It catches on, becomes wildly popular, and now it appears that many in the rest of the world resent them for it. Seems like a classic case of "no good deed goes unpunished"
Mod me a troll if you disagree, but I am genuinely interested in hearing the counter argument. I'm not being flip. I really would like to hear what people have to say. Even if they were doing a really really awful job and being super political, etc, why should they give up control of their own innovation?
Think about it. If there was no "Google" already, and Microsoft choose that as a name, we would all be saying how dorky it was. Same goes for "yahoo" or "skype" or any number of web company names you could pick from a hat.
Their problem is that they really have to come up with something that is a few orders of magnitude better than Google or its not worth switching. It can't be "as good" or even "a little better." Its got to be way way better than google (just like how google was way better than everyone else when they first showed up).
What we see here is an example of people being stupid.
Seems more like an example of people having a little fun as evidenced in these quotes from TFA:
However, any automation project worth doing is worth over doing, and I way overshot the mark
As I promised earlier, if you donate to the site and are unhappy about the rolls, let me know and I will pull a die out of the machine, melt it flat and mail it to you, as an object lesson to the other dice.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.