Yes, because we know that the deniers can be swayed by an overabundance of evidence, and that they always seek to find answers for themselves instead of blindly parroting conspiracy-blog talking points!

See also:

http://www.theonion.com/articl...

Furthermore, most of it is suuuuuper boring!

Hmm, what does that remind me of...

This "timeline" is the ultimate privacy nightmare and will be a blight on all those that suffer it.

"Show me six lines written by the most honest man in the world, and I will find enough therein to hang him"

If you thought your employer seeing your Facebook was bad, that was a little taste compared to what they'd do with this.

That's actually why the movie was done as a parody. Trying to play the book straight would result in something that looks an awful lot like a fascist propaganda film.

I'd guess he was captured by a bigfoot to work on their hidden communication infrastructure that helps them avoid groups of credible humans.

Bandanas and other face coverings make you look like a criminal about to commit a crime, and aren't allowed in many places. Weird glasses just make you look like a hipster or Kanye West fan.

You're absolutely correct (except perhaps about the Eemian period not being catastrophic - 13+ft of sea level rise would be nothing to scoff at today!), but none of these facts should rule out making changes to keep the climate in a state that works for our civilization.

We'll probably never have a "good stable state," we'll have to keep making intentional climate alterations constantly in the future - as the population increases, a "good" state will be more and more narrowly defined as well. We can't let the planet's temperature vary anymore, not due to man-made causes today or any natural ones in the future. We have to keep watching the thermostat from now on or it's going to get ugly.

Keep in mind that we're really really good at warming the climate, so we won't fall into another ice age easily.

We haven't proven a lot of things through full-scale experiment - like gravity and most other things related to astrophysics for example. How do you feel about those? Pure speculation?

We can adjust outdoor climate with greenhouse gas levels as we've been doing, or with aerosols as discussed in TFA.

Funny, that's what I think about denying that fairness is possible.

We have some control over weather and climate, tinfoil-hatters notwithstanding.

Major city? More like those of us who live within easy driving distance of civilization.

Nothing happened, I don't see the conflict. The atmosphere got hotter because of the amount of CO2 in it, not the amount of sunlight coming in. But reducing the amount of sunlight coming in can still cool it.