Rich people often personally move large quantities of cash around - for reasons that are often illegal and almost always unethical, but that's not the point here. The point is that the first time a rich dude has his DIY cash shipment intercepted, this idiocy will end quickly. But what are the odds of an expensive and classy car with a classy, usually white person behind the wheel getting pulled over?

Hmm, if drug dealers moved their cash in Maybachs they'd go untouched!

Funny or Interesting? O_O

Very unfortunate name...

Me neither:

http://www.realclimate.org/ind...

It just turns the combination of auto-follow/auto-brake and auto-lane-hold that negligent jackasses have been using like an autonomous driving system into a proper, integrated feature.

I'm not sure, maybe the author should spend a few more pages describing it.

When these cameras are used to feed a policeman's AR glasses and are running full-time face recognition, gait analysis and LPR along with a comms interface, you're going to have hivemind supercops, not necessarily a good thing with a so very imperfect set of laws.

"Misandry" is like "anti-white oppression." Completely valid as a concept, surely happens somewhere in real life if rarely, but mostly just a rallying cry of bigots in practice.

For example, ISP services usually don't offer IMAP, SMTP, AND web interface access, while many free services do. The storage on the ISP-hosted mail is also usually pathetic by modern standards - and if you're someone like me who accesses their mail exclusively through the web interface, that's important.

This is why you never ever use the email address provided by an ISP. Not only is it a blatant lock-in tactic, but these days the email service they provide is inferior in every way to the free offerings out there.

It's also worth considering that if you play online, you'll get called a faggot, a nigger, and receive rape & death threats even if you're a straight white guy. If you give these pissed-off manchildren access to solid information on your race/gender/sexuality, all that does is give a specific target to the insults so they don't have to take the shotgun approach.

I love when people use the acronym "SJW," it's even more efficient than "misandry." It says "I am unapologetically backwards as fuck on a wide variety of issues, to the point that I am upset at the existence of people who are opposed to my backwardness."

Don't forget being saddled with enough debt that they'll think very carefully about any risky job changes.

If we were only thinking in terms of human lifespans, most science would be irrelevant. Geology and climatology? That stuff hardly changes in a human lifetime! Astronomy? Why bother with anything beyond Pluto?

Thinking within a human lifespan is very short sighted for anything but what you want to achieve before you die. You could even argue that the grouping is practically permanent for the lifespan of our species, but that grouping would still be technically wrong compared to our best knowledge.

I'd like to add that if needed, Moot should feel free to copy Linus Torvalds' response to this question.

Huh? He's not Ayn Rand.

>:)