Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Treason.. or... (Score 1) 524

Magna Carta was sealed by the King nearly three hundred years prior to the discovery of the Americas by European explorers.
The Colonies were founded, for the most part, by people emigrating from England, for the New World in search of a better life.
Those people were, until the Declaration of Independence, wholly governed by the Laws and Customs of England.

Do you get it yet?

By the way, Magna Carta is not a "British" document. It is the very foundation and basis of every Constitutional Republic on the fucking planet. INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Comment Re:I hearby pledged my oath and rifle... (Score 1) 524

Assad didn't brutalise the opposition, the simple fact of the matter is that he has overwhelming majority support. The people that are fucking his country up are demonstrably foreign mercenaries in the pay of Britain, the United States, France, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar.

sources: plenty of contacts on the ground who are living it, not the BBC, Fox, CNN or Reuters. What they aren't showing is buzzcut ex-army regulars using CIA terminology and training to great effect while passing instructions to each other in English, French, and Turkish. Why? Because it not only doesn't suit the agenda (whatever that might be) of those with plausible interests in the region, it would in fact further damage already salted international relations.

However, I will absolutely and unreservedly agree that in a perfect world a peaceful solution to any crisis results in a better outcome for all concerned. Unfortunately, this is far from being a perfect world, and as a result of corporate interests and to a lesser but still significant extent, ever more demanding tribal competition for the biggest portion of a finite supply of everything, people can and do die in the most horrible ways imaginable; the truth belongs to those who shout the loudest (the facts will never be known beyond the fact that people have died as a result of the deployment of some very nasty weapons), and if history records that Assad deployed those weapons even if he didn't, tomorrow we'll have as much a distorted view of today's events as we have today of events of a mere seventy years ago in Eastern Europe.

Comment Re:Treason.. or... (Score 1) 524

Failure to act on an awareness of a treasonous act is an offence, it is known as misprision.
Failure to comply with an unlawful order, instruction or request is not treason. It shows the highest respect for the Law.
Refusal to comply with an order from a Government agency which has time and again showed itself to be self-appointed superjudicial is entirely in keeping with one of the oldest Constitutional documents in existence, one which like it or not, citizens and Government of the United States are still subject to: Magna Carta. Specifically, clause 61, which in a small nutshell obligates any individual or group who are aware of the unlawfulness of a Law or Statute to disobey that Law or Statute and to seek redress.

Comment Re:Treason.. or... (Score 1) 524

Isn't the very fact of recent disclosures by the US Government (to whit; that they are giving aid and comfort to the Enemy - by their own definition, elements of al Qaeda "known" to be working alongside Syrian rebels), an overt admission of treason?

Or is that a vexation, to be ignored by the Judicial branch?

Comment Re:Sounds good to me (Score 1) 555

in English Law, there is a common clause in most Statutes that holds company directors equally and personally liable for ANY violations that occur within or provably on behalf of the company. The situation described in this article would not serve as an example, but here's one that would:

A company has an employee who drives a company car. Said employee causes an incident while driving under the influence of a controlled substance. Said incident causes fatalities. For the sake of argument, he is charged and convicted with negligent manslaughter. Guess what? Since he did it with the company car, on company time, the Director of the company is held equally liable and is also charged and convicted with negligent manslaughter as if he himself was at the wheel. See how that works yet?

It stems from the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, where the phrase "I was only following orders" didn't get SS guards or Gestapo officers - or their superiors, who may or may not have even been present at a single execution - off of death sentences.

Comment Re:Sounds good to me (Score 1) 555

No, I'll tell you what'll follow: Colt Arms, Smith & Wesson and BSA subjected to class action lawsuits following incidents in which tools made by them have been directly implicated in fatalities. Ford Motor company, General Motors and Hyundai getting the same treatment. Cold Steel and Stanley as well following people getting shanked with Bowies and boxcutters. Stihl and McCulloch getting sued after some arse in Arkansas decides it might be a good idea to ignore the safety advice printed on the bar and attempt to stop the fucking thing with his scrotum.

This shit might sound ridiculous, but this is the way you're advocating. THAT, to me, sounds utterly fucking batshit insane.

Slashdot Top Deals

The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin

Working...