Submission + - 2008: Year of Linux on the... Laptop!?!
capnkr writes: Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols writes in his column for eWeek titled "Cheap Laptops Bad for Vista, Good for Linux": "The good news for everyone is that you can get a good, solid laptop for under a grand these days. The bad news for Vista users is that many of those laptops, even though they're sold with Vista, have nothing like enough resources to run Vista decently."
And that is exactly my own experience with a $398 (retail) Vista Home Basic laptop. My impression of the first Windows OS I've 'owned' in over 6 years is that it is rudimentary, slow, and, to my eye-candy chagrin, has no capability of *ever* running Aero. OTOH, Linux installed on the same laptop (w/100% hardware compatibility, no less) is current, complete, very fast, stable, and even runs Beryl.
"The Year of Linux on the Desktop" has been a standing /. joke of years, but given the turbulent economy and lackluster performance and uptake of Vista, might the low price point of these cheap laptops combined with the (increasing visibility and popularity) of a better, free operating system create significant gains in the numbers of Linux users? Perhaps Microsoft should not have 'pushed' Vista onto platforms not really suited to running it?
And that is exactly my own experience with a $398 (retail) Vista Home Basic laptop. My impression of the first Windows OS I've 'owned' in over 6 years is that it is rudimentary, slow, and, to my eye-candy chagrin, has no capability of *ever* running Aero. OTOH, Linux installed on the same laptop (w/100% hardware compatibility, no less) is current, complete, very fast, stable, and even runs Beryl.
"The Year of Linux on the Desktop" has been a standing