Comment Where have I seen this before? (Score 1) 213
Right: NewtonOS 2.0, ca. 1995:
http://manuals.info.apple.com/Apple_Support_Area/Manuals/newton/NewtonProgrammerRef20.PDF
Chapters 18 and 19, routing and transports.
Right: NewtonOS 2.0, ca. 1995:
http://manuals.info.apple.com/Apple_Support_Area/Manuals/newton/NewtonProgrammerRef20.PDF
Chapters 18 and 19, routing and transports.
This was a company internal presentation, not for journalists. If you watch the whole video, it becomes clear that this was not a controlled leak, there are other references to ongoing work which I seriously doubt Elop wants to have out in public.
Intel hired a lot of the Nokia people working on Maemo and Meego. I'm very curious what they can pull off, and I wish them good luck! Elop's concerns were not the technology though, but the execution. Shooting him as the messenger makes no sense.
You're paranoid. Plus the poison pill agreement is not relevant anymore now that Qt is under the LGPL (it was drafted before the license change). Check the work on open governance for Qt.
To learn from the former Trolls how to create great software. The framework is important, but so are the people working on it, and how they get things done.
My workplace (over 100k users) just migrated to Microsoft hosted email. And we're in some areas direct competitors of Microsoft.
...this is going to draw in QT Embedded
What makes you think this?
Care to shed some more light on this too?
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion