Isn't the bottom line here though to protect the riders? Even it takes being cleared in a thousand jurisdictions, no one should be allowed to be put in a position where they could harm another if they have ever done so in the past.

So wouldn't the problem be solved by requiring companies to pay 4x the highest requested wage an American requests before granting an H-1B application?

So you don't feel people should be held responsible for their actions, or inactions?

Isn't H-1B the program that allows foreigners to steal American jobs from Americans? Really not sure how I'm supposed to feel here.

I used to love playing video games, but now they all seem to be so focused on multiplayer that it is extremely difficult to find one that is both enjoyable and challenging without having to go online.

It should be law that the management of companies who place the lives of others in danger without performing due diligence to screen their subcontractors and employees will be subject to the same punishment as those that they subcontract to to provide services for the crimes their subcontractors or employees commit.

...just breeds violent people I hold up the US as the prime example. Even the police there believe killing others makes them stronger.

It just seems to make sense to me that a payer of medical bills would collect information that would confirm the validity of the bills that they were paying. Sharing that aforesaid information is a totally different ball of wax though.

Science limits people with its rules that facts must be proveable. Art has no limits, and allows people to explore everything that can be imagined. Both have there place though, and it would be a shame for market forces to favor one above the other.

Humanity has long passed moved beyond survival of the individual. Survival of the species is the only thing that has value today.

What convinces you that Chrome is spyware?

Google.

The "Coding Gods" will be quick to punish you is you share your strange thoughts.

Seriously, that is the major reason many who could contribute don't. Oh, and of course there is also GPL3 versus BSD, object oriented versus procedural, point and click versus command line, and another myriad of thousands of omnipotent issues that most be decided before one should even consider contributing to open source.

Do you not get that the vast majority of people don't want to volunteer their time and effort only to be belittled and berated by the "Coding Gods"? Hell, even this debate over "systemd" has a lot of us wondering if you all have any respect for each other.

...certainly their chips will also have some real world uses as well? It's not like Google spy hardware has much of a future after all.