Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:A thousand KBOs discovered, not dwarf planets (Score 1) 77

Not only that, but as the probe has approached, it discovered . . .

They're right. That's no planet . . . it's a fully armed battle station!

Get us out of here . . .

Unfortunately, the minimal fuel reserves are no match for a tractor beams, and our little friends are going to die . . .

hawk

Comment Re:The word "powerfull" is rather missleading (Score 1) 197

I had a couple of those, first a 35" or 45" sony, iirc and then my father in law's 55" (?) monster.

Especially on the first one, the hardware handled an insufficient number of simultaneous colors (think back to 8 bit video cards).

So watching football, most of the colors would get used on the first couple of lines. After that, it needed to use the nearest available green for any more it hit. So I would end up with huge lines separating patches of monochromatic green, looking like a video game rather than a real picture.

(still a good enough picture that my cat would sit and watch, wanting to pounce one of the players . . .)

Much better on the later television, but it had a 700 line screen, so it had to extrapolate from the 450 or so out of the 525 that are actually broadcast with picture, and the jaggies were more pronounced than the mere color artifacts . . .

hawk

Comment Re:Free from captivity... for how long? (Score 1) 341

>If it came to that, youâ(TM)d have to appoint an attorney to stand for the critterâ(TM)s interests who would argue
>diminished capacity and no ability for form mens rea.

Nah, that's for homo sapiens..

For other primates, you appoint a a babboon to argue mens rheus.

(this is complicated lawyer stuff. Don't try it at home!)

And in related news, Disney is again making a fortune from rentals of The Monkey's Uncle.

hawk, esq.

Comment OSEC (Score 1) 327

>Great. So once solar installations start producing more total power than is consumed during peak
>production hours we should consider intentionally reducing their total output in order to better align
>production with consumption.

Exactly.

We form OSEC, the Organization of Solar Exporting Consumers, and limit our production to keep prices up.

hawk

Comment Re:Already been there done that (Score 1) 525

>Montana used to have no speed limit during the daytime

A common myth about Montana & Nevada before the 55, and Montana after the repeal of the 65.

While there was no posted speed, the "Basic Speed Law" applied in both states, and speeding tickets issued in both.

I have an older friend here that was a passenger in a car pulled over years ago. The NHP officer accused him of running away, stating that it had taken however many minutes to catch him.

"No I wasn't, and I can prove it."

'How can you possibly prove that?'

He got out, lifted the hood, and showed the 6 barrel carburetor.

The officer sent him on his way. He had been, after all, just driving over 100 in a car in good condition.

hawk

Comment Re:Of course it did (Score 2) 89

Not quite.

If ethanol was lethal, it would be undesirable, and avoided. There would be an inclination away from the fermenting fruit on the ground.

For those who could digest the food that is poisonous to their competitors, a desire for such things would lead to going to consume them more often.

It's not the ones without,, but rather with the tolerance gene that would benefit from being drawn to the fermenting fruit.

hawk

Comment Re:Nevada, not Utah (Score 1) 138

>The anti Yucca plan was based on ignoring science.

???

Did you really write that?

The anti-Yucca in Nevada is *not* anti-nuclear; it's not even NIMBY.

The law to choose a dump specified that every site on the list was to be evaluated, and that the dump *shall* be built at the safest site on the list.

Not built if a site is safe, but at the *safest* of the sites to be considered.

Guess how many sites were on the list. (if you guess 2 or more, you have no idea what you're talking about.

So after being told that the site was coming here whether it was safe or not, some people got upset.

I have no problem with a long term nuclear storage facility that close to me. I *do* have a problem with the gang of idiots running that site running anything with chemicals more dangerous than bubble soap.

Over a million dollars of damage in an earthquake . . . to their on-site building studying earthquake safety.

And how does the 100 year water level compare to the proposed location of the material? (known for 20 or 30 years).

A site there is welcome. A site run by those morons under Senator Bennet's rules is another matter.

hawk

Slashdot Top Deals

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...