Comment Re:Really? (Score 1) 276
1) people already have listed houses for bitcoin.
2) trade the bitcoin you have held for years into local currency and buy any house you want genius.
1) people already have listed houses for bitcoin.
2) trade the bitcoin you have held for years into local currency and buy any house you want genius.
The funny thing (to me) is that in 2-3 years you would probably be able to buy a house with those bitcoins. But I guess you'll always have the vegas memories...
you can lead a horse to water...
I wonder what the electric universe (and electric sun) theorists will have to say about this.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if they predicted this type of activity years ago. That's what happened with comets after all, and the mainstream was surprised over and over again as we got better and better pictures of rocky comets and performed experiments that matched the EU predictions and not the "dirty ball of ice" theory. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34wtt2EUToo
Yes.
--
When the first space probes returned images of the Moon, they revealed a surface heavily pockmarked with craters and riddled with long-sinuous channels (or rilles). Scientists seeking to interpret these features were constrained by the traditional geologic toolkit. The "debate" over the lunar craters only included two possible causative agents: volcanism, or impact. Eventually, a consensus was reached that meteoric impacts were the primary source of lunar craters.
But more than forty years ago, the British journal Spaceflight published the laboratory experiments of Brian J. Ford, an amateur astronomer who raised the possibility that most of the craters on the moon were carved by cosmic electrical discharge. (Spaceflight 7, January, 1965).
In the cited experiments Ford used a spark-machining apparatus to reproduce in miniature some of the most puzzling lunar features, including craters with central peaks, small craters preferentially perched on the high rims of larger craters, and craters strung out in long chains. He also observed that the ratio of large to small craters on the Moon matched the ratio seen in electrical arcing.
--
http://www.thunderbolts.info/webnews/120707electriccraters.htm
Gravity is not the only or the strongest force in the universe.
Most likely the craters were caused by plasma discharges, ie electrical arcs.
Too much to go into here. Do yourself a favor. Google "electric universe". Read the book "The Electric Sky".
Or dark energy. Or black holes. Or machos. Or wimps. or whatever other mathematical fantasy they dream up to patch the ever widening gap between observations and an outdated theory.
Because we live in an electric universe. Because the electric force is orders of magnitude stronger than gravity.
"The Electric Sky" explains many many things that surprise those still worshiping the standard model as if it were gospel.
http://amzn.com/0977285111
Clever naming / rebranding by the libertarians.
duct tape, not duck tape. That's a bug in 1 out of 3 lines.
> Most of the world really is barely held together by bubble gum and duck tape
Variables don't; constants aren't.