You're assuming too much. Namely that "it works" and "is being improved."

Whatever happened to adverbs?
While we're at it, FUCK BETA.

FTFY.

Your grammar is awfully bad.

FTFY. See FSF & al.

No. It's a successful exercise at fault tolerance.

From the misery of this site it looks as if it was specifically designed to kill Obamacare.

No, they don't. That's the job for the spokespeople and publicists, some of whom may be these scientists. There's enough high school level information in the abstracts of their publications for the interested to peruse. Somehow though, most "interested" people don't show high school level education. I don't see why anyone should enable their learned helplesness. If people don't really learn they will question even those explanations^Winterpretations.

Short memory, seek professional help.

1. Ozone layer. We had no problem thoroughly damaging that.

2. Deforestation, desertification, city hot-spots, carbon dioxide emissions, cloud seeding (I'm not talking about "chemtrails" bullshit, just ordinary contrail/exhaust seeding), what else...

To illustrate it better, apply your hypothesis to human population.

Your error here is linear "thinking" (note the quotes).

1. 1. FTFY
2. 2. No, they really don't have to.

Meanwhile in Australia...

And whose fault is that? Should we really enable their lack of brain activity? I'm not worried aboot USAn dumbness. Let them suffer.

Check the article for price on Xmas Eve. And I'd like to know your opinion about THAT.