So, then I assume you are in support of the Resolution?
Since there appears to be misinformation on both sides (as always, and I'm not convinced the Register is wrong just because there have been articles questioning global warming - I would like references to the outright lies you reference, I know of a mistake about ice density, but the author issued a correction), it stands to reason we need to take a step break from our panic mode responses to have an in-depth verification and true peer-review of the data.
As we all know, statistics and numbers can be played in every direction. Everything is being cast as a "worst-ever" by politicians on both sides, and it is being used to push agendas, not to mention throwing money at solutions that may not exist.
Everyone needs to take a breath, calm down, and look at the real data (not the adjusted ones), and do some double blind and placebo testing (with intentionally false data to prove the models work the other way as well). Then we can properly evaluate our stance, and where to go.
Climate change has turned into a religion, with both sides covering their ears and screaming LA LA LA when they don't like the answers. Can we get some moderates with no stake in the game to look at this stuff?