Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:no (Score 2, Interesting) 531

So the fact is, all that's been shown is that people in the know aren't willing to pay for software designed to fuck with their property.

Yeah, but the vast majority of people who download aren't 'in the know', they just want free games. I happen to be both, so even if they removed DRM I'd probably continue pirating games. Realistically, the only way they would be able to stop this majority would be extreme DRM (call home every 5 minutes, requiring internet even for single player games). Removing bad DRM may get a few customers back, but it would get games up on thepiratebay faster, and probably lead to even more people downloading.

Comment Re:no (Score 1) 531

Are you being serious? They can put anything they want in the software they're selling, and it's the consumer's choice whether or not to purchase it. There are no parallels with the boston tea party, because nobody is forcing you to buy these games, whereas the unfair taxes were mandatory.

Comment Re:no (Score 1) 531

You're a protesting customer when you refuse to buy a game. You become a pirate and a thief when you torrent the game, regardless of your reasoning. Once you do that, corporations have no reason to have faith that you'll go back to lawfully buying their games if they were to remove DRM. Instead, you've shown that you'll go to any length to get the game, and that if they can create secure enough anti-piracy measures they'll get your money.

Comment Re:Beautiful (Score 1) 244

Yeah, battle.net and an mmo server have very, very little in common. The closest you get currently is FPS games where there server software comes with every copy of the game, some of which can host up to 64 players. That's hardly 'massively multiplayer' though.

Comment Re:Data Theft (Score 1) 278

All he did was ask a question.

He got mentioned more than 50 times in the following debate, that's much more than just a question. There's also the fact that had it been his blackberry or voicemail, there is potential for sensitive information to be leaked, something we don't have to worry about with Joe the Plumber.

Microsoft

Microsoft Treating "Windows-Only" As Open Source 383

mjasay writes "The Register is reporting that Microsoft is hosting Windows-only projects on its 'open source project hosting site,' CodePlex. Miguel de Icaza caught and criticized Microsoft for doing this with its Microsoft Extensibility Framework (MEF), licensing it under the Microsoft Limited Permissive License (Ms-LPL), which restricts use of the code to Windows. Microsoft has changed the license for MEF to an OSI-approved license, the Microsoft Public License, but it continues to host a range of other projects under the Ms-LPL. If CodePlex wasn't an 'open source project hosting site,' this wouldn't be a problem. But when Microsoft invokes the 'open source' label, it has a duty to live up to associated expectations and ensure that the code it releases on CodePlex is actually open source. If it doesn't want to do this — if it doesn't want to abide by this most basic principle of open source — then call CodePlex something else and we'll all move on."
Patents

Submission + - USPTO Issues "Paper-or-Plastic?" Patent to 1

theodp writes: "On Tuesday, IBM was granted U.S. Patent No. 7,407,089 for storing a preference for paper or plastic grocery bags on customer cards and displaying a picture of said preference after a card is scanned. The invention, Big Blue explains, eliminates the 'unnecessary inconvenience for both the customer and the cashier' that results when 'Paper or Plastic?' must be asked. The patent claims also cover affixing a cute sticker of a paper or plastic bag to a customer card to indicate packaging preferences. So does this pass the 'significant technical content' test, IBM'ers?"
Google

Submission + - Google.co.ca hijacked? 1

rips123 writes: A quick check of www.google.co.ca returns a page with embedded iframe pointing to searchportal.information.com with some sort of referrer ID attached.

A big of diging around points at relay.co.jp which resolves to the same subnet as the www.google.co.ca webserver. Entering the server by IP (66.196.36.22) reveals the old familiar "What you need, when you need it" domain-squatter site.

None of the major news houses seem to have picked up on this yet but its been this way for the past 6 hours at least and its resolving this way from Australia, Tokyo, Osaka and as such I presume globally.

Feed New York Times: Stake Is Bought in IAC/InterActiveCorp (nytimes.com)

The Liberty Media Corporation, the entertainment and Internet retailing company controlled by the billionaire John C. Malone, purchased 14 million shares of IAC/InterActiveCorp, the company controlled by Barry Diller, for $339.5 million.

Slashdot Top Deals

1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.

Working...