Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why not Chinese prisoners? Even cheaper! (Score 1) 123

AC was replying to the implication that crowdsourcing is analogous to slavery, or that this involves child labor, without any evidence or data to substantiate the claim. AC's point was that these guys are getting paid for a job they signed up for - Blair1q seemed to imply this was not the case.

Comment Re:Why not Chinese prisoners? Even cheaper! (Score 2) 123

You would have to assume the kind of workers being hired for this work have literacy and numeracy skills that mark them out as being above the physical-labor-sweatshop conditions that you're referring to there. The most likely employees for this work are middle-class mothers with some education background - at least high school - and with some free time while raising the kids. Who are you to begrudge someone to earn a little money for their time?

Comment Re:Encrypt everything. (Score 1) 89

There's a bash.org quote that I can't find right now (at work) where the guy was doing transfers in cents to a friend with a word or two attached, and apparently managed to carry out a conversation. I'm suddenly put in mind of that - if you can only encrypt a certain class of "communication", then why not encode & communicate over that?

Comment Re:Patents (Score 1) 514

It sounds like its time to fire the CEO. They paid billions just a few months ago for WebOS from Palm and now have nothing to show for it.

Well... not quite "a few months ago". They paid $1.2bn in April-June 2010; the purchase was complete on July 1; CEO Mark Hurd resigned August 6 2010. August 18 2011, new CEO Leo Apotheker (formerly of SAP) announced they were getting out of the business.

Either way that was a very expensive bad investment if you blow billions just to dump it a very short time later. If patents were that bad the CEO should have made sure their employees did a risk analysis and investigate this. I mean this is why you pay the employees right? Idiots

Maybe the patents are worth more than the price paid for Palm in 2010 - after all, we've since seen a lot more litigation on the basis of these patents, and two multi-billion dollar deals that look to be driven by patents. The asset has appreciated, so it could have ended up being a very smart buy. Guess we'll see in the next few weeks as it plays out.

Slashdot Top Deals

I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"

Working...