Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment I must be reading it wrong (Score 5, Informative) 150

Because it seems to criminalize a wide swath of legitimate civilian research. From TFA
high-performance, neural, optical and fault-tolerant, computers,
electronics,
wavelength research (remember, wi-fi was ‘invented’ in Australia),
heat-shielding,
telecommunications,
information security research,
robotics,
human, animal and plant pathogens, both bacterial and viral,
fibre optics,
cryptography.
satellite technology.
sensor technology.
signal and image processing.
composite materials, andthe list could go on and on.
This effectively criminalizes half of all science related activity at colleges. It's not just the best and brightest it's literally asking the A ark to sail in some kind of reverse HHGTG parody.

Comment Re:Nice idea but (Score 1) 185

Too bad so many of these cheap chargers will crank your 16850s to 4.2 volts.

Nominal voltage is the average voltage over discharge. Often this range is 3-4.2V. Cheap chargers are extremely dangerous as even 4.25V can be hard on cells and anything much over 4.4 is at a greatly increased risk of thermal runaway.

yes i googled this ev post vehicle nonsense and all i found were feel good political bs and almost no detail or facts or evidence.

You were expecting their business plan?

i was expecting some facts. Perhaps some data. I guess facts are too much to ask.

They would be better off simply reprocessing the materials and starting over.

That might be true. Citation?

From page 46 of this report Discussions egarding smart grid applications include using automotive battery packs connected to the grid for temporary energy storage, and as emergency power supplies when power is unavailable. There is also considerable discussion in the industry regarding repurposing used or refurbished automotive battery packs for stationary applications such as home level power storage once the packs are no longer suitable for use in vehicles.70 It remains to be seen whether refurbishment of packs will be practical or economical,71 as cells must generally be well matched to provide good performance in battery packs, and aged cells are particularly difficult to match effectively. In addition, for refurbished pack safety, the issue of determining when a cell should be retired will need to be resolved.
tl;dr leading industry experts have the exact same concern for the viability as I have mentioned.

Comment Re:Stop using lithium! (Score 1) 185

Maybe your state is different. I have tried this it dosen't work where I live. You can take them to the hazardous waste drop off site for your county if you show them your license or other id. I live about 15 minutes away from mine - outside of some rude attitude they do a really good job.

Comment Re:Nice idea but (Score 1) 185

It's less to do with planned obsolescence and more to do with the fact lithium cells of almost any kind tolerate very little overcharge before there is a fire. When you pump out a million packs even one fire can create a lawsuit. If you don't have the safety required by the various regulatory agencies, or compared to average products you open yourself to lawsuits. about the only way out is the hobby market which is about 0% of total battery sales and 98% of total fires (you can google these fires destroying homes, cars, etc with high frequency). Imo some of these e-cig manufacturers are going to get fucked because I've disassembled them and there is next to no protection and I've read about many fires in them also.
yes i googled this ev post vehicle nonsense and all i found were feel good political bs and almost no detail or facts or evidence. They would be better off simply reprocessing the materials and starting over.

Comment Re:Wouldnt NiFe be a better battery chemistry here (Score 1) 185

It most certainly is true power per weight and volume is nearly useless for backup. The only major first order factor is cost per kWh per year. Glad to hear you say that not only are lithium batteries not really used a lot at any scale but they type used in teslas are not used at all. Thanks for agreeing.

Comment Re:Nice idea but (Score 1) 185

Do you have a source?

Battery packs are made of multiple cells, not all the cells go bad at once. Break down a laptop battery sometime. You can find perfectly working cells which are actually fully charged, completely hosed cells which won't take a charge, and cells which appear to work but whose lifetime is very short. The problem is that all of these cells are wired into one pack which has a limited ability to bypass cells. In most cases the pack is only capable of ignoring groups of cells, sometimes as few as two — but it's pretty rare that a cell can actually be cut out individually. So right next to a non-working cell, there can be a cell which will be highly useful in a recycled context.

I only recently started breaking down laptop battery packs, because only recently did I get any significant number of them. My hit rate for getting good cells out of it is over 25%, and the dump takes the old cells for recycling with no fee... The Tesla in particular uses packs which are made out of 18650 cells, just like a laptop. They have slightly more expensive chemistry and a differently-shaped electrode, but you could stuff them into ultrafire flashlights like cells from laptop packs.

So no source then. I not only have designed lithium battery packs but also the smart battery circuitry for military grade robots. I've also been working with secondary lithium batteries since before you could get them in America, my first orders came from Australia and Asia. For example alone, as a safety system, the majority of battery packs for laptops include a fusable link where upon failure of a single cell it is shorted and burnt out thereby disabling the entire pack. Simply hooking up a new pack or replacing a damaged cell has multiple problems as you need to reset the smart battery firmware (not available over smbus via the laptop) and replacing a single cell throws off the cell balancing (among other things) quite badly. You basically are fucked and need an entirely new battery or years of experience in hacking battery systems and programming firmware.
for Automotive packs you may be able to bypass stacks of cells but then your max charge rate and discharge rate is affected quite badly. Furthermore since you are likely using your batteries quite a bit this would likely require maintenance and therefore cost. It's unlikely the battery pack is dynamically arranged into groups of 2 cells, typically the nominal voltage is 3.6-3.7v depending on chemistry and annode/cathode. For higher voltage packs, you likely lose the whole string for a single bad cell. For example even if you bypassed them and had 10 parallel for the first series battery, you would only have 9 parallel at some point and this would unbalance your whole pack and limit you to 9 series equivelant even with cell balancing (which is usually resistive and not capacitive). This then runs the remaining cells harder and puts exponentially more wear on the already nearly dead battery.

Comment Re:Stop using lithium! (Score 1) 185

Also id add that if you aren't buying an exact replacement, the battery vendor is not obliged to take your used battery at all. The most common time to replace is around 5-7 years at which time exactly jack squat % of people have their receipt. Responsible people who tried to keep the receipt are likely to recycle properly even if lost whereas the fuck it crowd is around 100% likely to dump it in a pond or trash can because driving 15 miles to dump it properly and free wouldn't be saying fuck it.

Comment Re:Stop using lithium! (Score 1) 185

In the US, all places that sell car batteries actually give money for the old dead batteries. It is called the "core charge" and is because there is serious money in recycling the lead acid car batteries to be used on the next generation of batteries.

http://shop.advanceautoparts.c...

Apparently, according to this site, it is mandated by state, but I would expect it to occur in most states as there is good money in the recycling.

Lololololol. They CHARGE you the core charge up front. It's not like they pay for defunct batteries. Unless you plan on buying a new battery the old ones can only be turned in for free at a few select government run locations. People are often faced with paying to dispose of them properly or simply crating a mini environmental disaster. Guess which many choose?

Comment Re:Wouldnt NiFe be a better battery chemistry here (Score 1) 185

I didn't mean to imply nife batteries are the answer. Merely that burnt out lithium packs pose many problems and even if initially cheap are unlikely to be cost effective in the long run. And yes those packs were only intended to run 8 years it's not just that they likely have sub 70% initial capacity - they are far more likely to fail internally and have much higher internal resistance. Lithium packs not only go bad with age but discharge cycles - they will be cycled once a day in this case making things worse. In fact lithium batteries aren't likely the best solution in general.

Comment Re:Wouldnt NiFe be a better battery chemistry here (Score 1) 185

I think you just explained why lithium batteries aren't very good for backup, doubly so nearly dead ev packs. The metric to minimize is cost per kWh/year. Including maintaining them. So swapping out failing ev batteries every 1-3 years gets expensive fast compared to a bullet proof long term low maintenance battery. There is a reason so few backup power systems use lithium.

Comment Re:Wouldnt NiFe be a better battery chemistry here (Score 1) 185

They're going to be constantly replacing LiOn packs on any appreciable sized system.

And why would they be doing that?

Let's say it all together now: "Li-ion != Cell phone batteries". Li-ion is a whole broad range of chemistries that follow a basic mechanism of action involving the intercalation of lithium ions on either side of a membrane. There are an incredibly wide range of anodes, cathodes, electrolytes, and membranes, and these offer widely varying performance in terms of power density, energy density, cost, cycle life, and shelf life. Cell phone and laptop batteries are li-ion batteries specifically engineered with design life deemphasized in favor of high energy density in order to keep their products small and light. They're not climate controlled and they're generally run at high depths of discharge. This is not what you do with all li-ion battery types. Where longevity is of concern, you more carefully control temperature, control charging more carefully, you have many cells in parallel that can allow for individual cell failures, you use a lower DoD, and you use a chemistry that sacrifices some energy density for greatly improved cycle life.

The exact same rules apply to NiMh. You can get NiMH with high energy density by sacrificing cycle life. A typical NiMh hybrid battery pack only achieves its lifespan by running at a tiny 20-40% DoD range.

Yes but there is a reason few if any large power backups use lithium technologies of any type. Typically it is lead acids. Using a radically different lithium battery from the tesla wont reduce the cost of tesla packs much and further consumers wont like paying more money up front for less reliable and more expensive solutions just to improve Musks bottom line. Pretty much all lithium batteries are a pain in the ass to work with their main selling point is the power and energy density, both of which are useless for backup.

Comment Re:Great Idea (Score 1) 185

There is more than just a "green" reason to build local microgrids. Energy Security and Grid Reliability are two. The American electrical grid, built decades ago and in need of major upgrades, is acknowledged to be a problem moving forward with renewable energy. Utilities complain that they can't handle the load. As utilities whine about what solar and wind will do to their grids(while simultaneously poopooing renewables and how much power they can generate) SolarCity will build microgrids that will allow localized power generation and distribution, so the tender and fragile utilities-of-old won't have to be bothered by pesky solar derived electricity. The American megagrids serve a purpose, and they should be upgraded, however we should be simultaneously building infrastructure than is localized and more robust. Someone should not lost power because a tree fell on a line hundreds of miles away.

That's all well and good but what if you are producing power from your solar and your batteries are full? I just am not getting the no grid tie in.

Slashdot Top Deals

Get hold of portable property. -- Charles Dickens, "Great Expectations"

Working...