Makes me think, do you know what they put behind those horns back then?

Same setup here except for the horn-loaded speakers. I found that the sound was better with dome tweeters without a horn. 3 way bass-reflex with conic bass and midrange and dome tweeter. Electrostatic speakers were interesting too although expensive.

Horn-loaded speakers prevailed when you went above, say, 150 W RMS. They seem to be a must in all concerts. I have never seen a dome tweeter in those contexts.

Then again, I hear that horns are hard to tune so maybe I just listened to crappy horn-loaded speakers back then ;-)

Cheers,

A friend of mine bought a Nakamichi cassette recorder for 2000$ in 1985. It used to play and record just about as well as my reel to reel tape recorder that I bough for half that price.

Depends on the speed you are recording at. I used to use Scotch Classic tape and record at 3.75 in/s for even longer play time. You could go up to 15 and even 30 in/s but my toshiba tape recorder was doing 7.5 in/s max if I remember correctly.

Whatever tape I used degraded over time, hence keep the vinyl as a master copy and re-record it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

I used to immerse my turntable in water, well almost, recording the record on real to real tape, then keep the record as a master. Full analog sound with no static nor scratch sounds;-)

True enough, I also use ghostery to avoid loading even more crap.

It is useless to resist us.

In the end, never say it is impossible. It's like arguing implosion won't prevail in Manhattan.

Thinking twice, then again, you can still tweak with file locking strategies.

Indeed, you have to rsync when all file handles are closed.

hehe, that's exactly what I was saying and I understand. Peace.

ssh and openshh: ssh is proprietary
solaris and opensolaris: solaris is proprietary
apache and no openapache: apache is open source

You seems like you have been trying to use it, haven't you? Like most open source solutions, you might have to tweak it a bit to get it to do what you want and then again, you have to make compromise. But be assured it works in a satisfactory way for me. Just get a proprietary solution if you can't make it work as you wish. Oh my god, I just realized you sounded like a guy that would choose the later solution ;-)

I know what you are saying although and there is some truth to it.

Take care man ;-)

name of the company: SSH Communications Security

since they grabbed a lot from open source in the beginning, I guess they allowed openssh to develop an open source version.

The original SSH version is still proprietary nowadays.

You mean I don't need to install Cygwin anymore like I have been doing for the past 15 years to accomplish just that?

Next proposal: implement rsync natively...