The download links are still pointing to beta 7.
https://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html

To my knowledge, the name of the bank was not revealed. Where did you read that it was about Citibank?

Score!

I loved that video :)

There have been many leaks (just read the article this post links to to find out) about other governments and corporations in other countries. You're not hearing about the because the US based media doesn't cover them.

Just because they released stuff that target the US Government doesn't mean they are anti US. It just means than they got a lot of leaks from that country... and/or that the US has a lot of bad things to hide.

I hope this is about Goldman Sachs!

Too bad the numbers you put in your post don't have any ground in reality. Like you 14 trillion deficit for social Security:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/25/business/economy/25social.html?_r=1

"Create job abd raise the standard of living in both countries".

This statement is only true if you count the rich getting richer in the US. I fail to see how losing your middle class income job to outsourcing raises your stadard of living.

You can tear out tabs in FF like the rest of those browsers.

"or there is some kind of flash-player type add-on made for Firefox to support h264"

Flash already uses the h.264 codec for video so there is no need for anything more. And you won't have to switch to another browser because as long as there is no universal codec standard accross browsers, sites like YouTube will continue to use Flash, at least as a fallback method.

Except that Mozilla is a US company so your theory doesn't make sense.

Do a search for 'The Young Turks" on YouTube and you'll find another one.

From the summary: "...one of humanity's most bizarre environmental slip-ups".

And by humanity, you mean Americans right? (and perhaps Canadians)

The reason FF progressively uses more memory is that the DOM is wrapped in XPCOM. Since XPCOM is reference counted, it cannot properly be garbage collected by the JS engine. Microsoft has the same approach for IE. Supposedly, one of the project gols for 4.0 is to remove XPCOM bindings for the DOM so that all garbage collection uses the same scheme. In theory, this should greatly reduce the memory bloat.