Comment Re:Why the vapourware tag? (Score 2, Insightful) 130
Kevin has this right, what an obtuse article.
Henry Newman is talking about PC storage not enterprise storage. He discusses all disk IO performance in MBs/sec, meaning sequential. When in reality, very little (disk level) IO for the enterprise is sequential. The numbers here are flawed as is the characterization of storage.
Storage is where we keep our data. Keeping data is a central requirement of information technology. It will never be a peripheral feature.
Presently the real IO bottleneck is the spinning platter and the requirements of getting a read/write head to the right place quickly. Newer solid state storage devices will alleviate this bottleneck in the very near future. Perhaps PCM is the solution, but I for one will wait for a GB/$ threshold at which time the winning solid state storage will be available to everyone.
Mr. Newman talks about inter-computer bus speeds as not keeping up with CPUs and memory, when in fact they keeping up. The place where data transport still can't keep up, is serially on a single transport, (wire or optical). Networked (switchable) data needs to be serial single transport for a number of obvious reasons. Like the platter, this is a physical limitation and not easily surmounted.
If and when we get +10GB/sec consumer networks, storage networks (transporting SCSI blocks) will become a thing of the past as we pass and store all our data in an application aware protocol.