Comment heh (Score 0) 765
Yet somehow most European police forces manage just fine with their policies of disabling shots before lethal force. It's almost as if you're making things up.
Yet somehow most European police forces manage just fine with their policies of disabling shots before lethal force. It's almost as if you're making things up.
They're only forbidden to supply the drug to correctional facilities, since that market is utterly tiny theres absolutely no profit to be had in catering to it.
The law forbids cruel and unusual punishments and regardless of cruel, pushing someone off a tall building is certainly unusual. It would also I suspect be a bitch to clean.
There's plenty of tested ways of execution. Decapitation, gassing, hanging, firing squad, the previous lethal cocktail etc.
Generally when we as a society decide that we do not torture criminals to death, it is not because we don't feel the criminals deserve it, but rather that we as a society are better then that.
They controlled against no person present which had the same effect as female which means that it was the male odor that was the cause.
They also tested with scents from various male and female animals and the male scents still had the same effect.
Sweden can't make any such promise because Extradition is a court matter and any politician bypassing the court in such a matter would be performing a major breach of the separation of powers.
Have you heard about this newfangled institution called a library?
The policy is against selling drugs that will be used to kill people. The policy is not against selling drugs to regimes that kill people.
No, Bitcoin was never designed to be hard to trace, in fact Bitcoin by design is easy to trace.
Bla bla bla. Look, you just need to look at any kind of traffic accident vs car safety feature statistic to see that people in no way were better drivers with worse cars, they just died more.
It has nothing to do with how radio works, they give no fucks, it has everything with what the user of the radio expects. Laws are by and large written to apply to people, not technology.
If most people expect a situation to be private and you listen in, then you're an asshat and the law will usually punish you for it regardless of how easy it was for you to listen. This has nothing to do with the technical details of the situation.
It has nothing to do with how radio works, they give no fucks, it has everything with what the user of the radio expects. Laws are by and large written to apply to people, not technology.
Once again we come back to the fact that it's always really easy for the government to create political "thought-crimes" however with a solid constitution there's a limit to the damage they can do.
You have to remember that it's infeasible to write a constitution to prevent the government from writing bad laws at all, the fifth is a very important part in preventing the potential abuse of the rather inevitable bad laws.
If you want an example of recent US history where the 5th was very important, just remember:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism
Imagine how much worse that could have been without the 5th even if it was to an extent disregarded.
The country I live in is Sweden.
Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.