Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I can't be the only one wondering (Score 1) 91

I'm wondering how the conventional logic at either end of the process would manage to cope with three values. Can hardware be designed to work with more than on/off one/zero logic, i.e. perhaps one reaction for zero volts, another reaction for 2 volts, and a third reaction for 4 volts.

Of course, I am not a hardware designer.

Comment Re: No. (Score 1) 362

That's true. You accept delivery of a computer, insert your favourite distro disc, and it won't boot.

I also build desktops for customers, and I get to decide which mainboard goes in, and which operating system is installed, and it will always be be whatever best meets the customer's needs (and pockets).

Comment Re:Not GoDaddy. (Score 2) 295

My experience has been that you get what you pay for. Had a domain registered with crazydomains, chosen because one of the other directors of the organisation is one of those folks who will always take the lowest bid. Surprise, surprise, we got nickel-and-dimed for everything else, and tech support was not encouraging. I quietly changed it to planetdomain (since then, absorbed by netregistry) when renewal time came around, and things are much better, even though we pay more.

I wouldn't touch anyone with words like "cheap", "crazy", or other trigger words in their business name.

On the other hand, I just can't see the value in anything from MelbourneIT.

Comment Update (Score 2) 169

While I was waiting to see if this would make the front page, I called a post-production business based at the Village Roadshow studios on the Gold Coast http://www.movieworldstudios.c...
and asked them about a transfer from video to film.

No-one does it in Australia. Lots of people doing film to video, but apparently I would need to send it to Technicolor in Thailand for a video-to-film transfer. And it would cost a lot more than the budget for the event. They suggested storage on multiple formats from Kodak Gold discs to USB memory sticks, using open-source codecs, with the codec whitepaper included.

There's always the cheap film-to-video method - project your film on a screen and point a video camera at it, but do it in reverse, i.e. point a film camera at my LCD monitor. I've got a super 8 camera, but it's silent, so the audio would have to be recorded separately.

I also got a look at the capsule - it's got about 1 or perhaps 2 cubic feet of storage, so it's not going to cope with more than a few minutes of film reels, having to compete with whatever else goes in. I'll add a DVD and a USB stick with some instructions.

As it's not going to be a surprise for those who open the capsule (copies of footage are going to the state library and anyone who wants a copy on DVD), I think I'll contact the National Film & Sound Archive http://www.nfsa.gov.au/ and ask them to store a copy, then include a nice letter in the capsule: "Would you like to see a movie of this? Ask at the Qld State Library or the National Film & Sound Archive."

Heh - captcha is "paranoia"

Submission + - Video storge for time capsule

dwywit writes: I've been asked to film this year's ANZAC services in my town. This is a big one, as it's the centenary of the Gallipoli campaign, and dear to our hearts here in Oz. The organisers have asked me to provide a camera-to-projector setup for remote viewing (they're expecting big crowds this year), and a recording of the parade and various services throughout the morning. Copies will go to the local and state library as a record of the day, but they would also like a copy to go into a time capsule. I have two issues to solve: 1. a storage medium capable of lasting 50 or 100 years and still be readable, and 2. a wrapper/codec that will be available and usable when the capsule is opened. I have the feeling that a conversion to film might be the only way to satisfy both requirements — it's easy enough to build a projector, or even re-scan the images for viewing. Has anyone got a viable alternative? Cloud storage isn't an option — this is going underground in a stainless steel container.

Comment Re:These guys call me every few months... (Score 2) 229

1. I get told that I am lying, and that they KNOW I'm running Windows.
2. I get more laffs out of leading them astray, "reading" the errors in my event logs.
3. Tried that. "I have several computers. Which one is it?" "All of them, sir" "But which one do you want me to turn on?" "Any of them, sir" "But which one are you getting the error messages from?" "All of them, sir" and so ad nauseam.
4. See #2

I've been handed off to "an expert on your computer", who I promptly told I knew he was a scammer. His reaction was to act surprised and even claim ignorance of phone scams.

Best reaction was telling one girl that her mother would be ashamed of her. That got a 5 second pause, then "Shit" and she hung up. I told another that I had a broken leg and couldn't get to my computer. You could practically hear the pages flipping as he searched for a response.

I once strung one along for 16 minutes, but 5 minutes seems to be a trigger point for most of them. I guess if you haven't got to *this* point in the script by the 5 minute mark, hang up and take the next call in the queue.

Comment Re:12 in laptop != desktop (Score 1) 161

Yep - and not just power, but storage. High-def video footage takes a lot of space, and it's not sensible to have your OS +programs on the same physical disk as your footage, and it's even better to have a multi-disk RAID for footage (RAID 5/6?), AND a separate disk for renders. Can't see them putting 3 or more drives in a laptop anytime soon.

I've spoken to a number of people who want to edit/produce their own videos, but the most complaints come from people using laptops, i.e. OS + programs, footage, and renders on the same physical drive, and they wonder why their corei7/8GB laptop won't process video faster.

Premiere Pro in particular is finicky about which video cards it's happy to use for hardware rendering (although it's only a plaintext file in the program's directory, and easily modified), but if your laptop's video isn't on the list, you'll be stuck with software rendering, which is MUCH slower.

Submission + - Linux 4,0 Getting No-Reboot Patching (zdnet.com)

An anonymous reader writes: ZDNet reports that the latest changes to the Linux kernel include the ability to apply patches without requiring a reboot. From the article: "So, Red Hat and SUSE both started working on their own purely open-source means of giving Linux the ability to keep running even while critical patches were being installed. Red Hat's program was named kpatch, while SUSE' is named kGraft. ... At the Linux Plumbers Conference in October 2014, the two groups got together and started work on a way to patch Linux without rebooting that combines the best of both programs. Essentially, what they ended up doing was putting both kpatch and kGraft in the 4.0 Linux kernel." Note: "Simply having the code in there is just the start. Your Linux distribution will have to support it with patches that can make use of it."

Comment Re:Yes, I agree (Score 1) 564

This concept has been in use on the AS/400/i Series/System i/whatever since 1988. Everything is an object, and carries its own object description. The object description tells you and the operating system what the object contains, e.g. user file data, index, source file, executable, etc, and that determines what can be done with it, and what programs are allowed to act on it. The system simply won't execute a data file, and you can't edit an executable. Doesn't matter what your access level is, you can't override it and patch an executable directly.

Slashdot Top Deals

Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.

Working...