Except that the leak is about the previous government...
I can't believe you were modded interesting (and not off-topic), but of course, it's
The map is correct? Each of the for maps use a different definition of Jewish/Palestinian land!
I don't even know what is the definition of the first map, probably attempt to use private ownership, or maybe the Jewish settlements are in white and everything else is considered Palestinian. The negev desert (bottom half) was largely unpopulated at the time (and very sparsely populated today).
The second map is of the UN decision, not of anything actually there. The Palestinians didn't accept this decision until 1988, and the result was the Israeli war of independence.
The Third actually depicts something somewhat meaningful, this are the borders by the end of mentioned war. However, the "Palestinian land" in this map wasn't Palestinian, it was either Jordanian or Egyptian (Gaza was under Egyptian control, the west bank Jordanian), the area didn't have any special status in those countries.
The fourth map is the result of the Oslo agreement, and it is basically the opposite of the first map. The agreement, since it was supposed to be only a step towards a permanent agreement, established the PA, and gave it control in most Palestinian populated areas. All further discussions between Israel and the PA assumes that these areas will remain under Palestinian control and almost all the occupied territories will be passed to them as well. If you accept the definitions of this map, it is a big step from the situation in 1967-1993, all white map.
Dreadful source, and in the maps as well (although each map, maybe except the first, can be said to be correct by some definition, comparing them is a lie).
it doesnt matter what's the nature of a leak - transparency, is transparency.
That's stupid, what about publishing the security arrangement of some nuclear missile silo with a description of the way to launch the missile at a chosen target? transparency is transparency...
The system needs some privacy, for internal communication. Not for decisions, but for communication.
Are you also happy that, for example, DPRK knows that PRC were discussing uniting Korea? I'm not an expert on DPRK, but it seems possible the leak of this information might even lead to a war.
Not every publication of classified information is whistle-blowing.
"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker