Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 16 declined, 5 accepted (21 total, 23.81% accepted)

×

Submission + - Newspaper's New Revenue Plan: Copyright Suits (wired.com)

SpicyBrownMustard writes: Wire magazine has coverage of the sudden numerous lawsuits filed by Righthaven, LLC regarding the content of the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
"Borrowing a page from patent trolls, the CEO of fledgling Las Vegas-based Righthaven has begun buying out the copyrights to newspaper content for the sole purpose of suing blogs and websites that re-post those articles without permission. And he says he’s making money."
The owner of the LVRJ comments on the strategy and the Las Vegas Sun has extensive coverage of each suit filed. The owner of one site has apparently settled for more than the site has made in six years. Media Matters suspects many if most of the suits may be politically motivated, and violates federal election law.

Submission + - Righthaven, LLC and LVRJ Taking Tips from the RIAA

SpicyBrownMustard writes: Righthaven, LLC has acquire the copyright for all content on the Las Vegas Review-Journal and is ignoring established DMCA take down procedures, and filing suit against dozens of small websites for "copying" the content of the LVRJ. The Las Vegas Sun has extensive coverage of the 72 suits filed in Nevada, which include demands for transfer of the domains of the sites they're suing. The owner of acdc-bootlegs.com has apparently settled for more money than he made from his site in the past six years. Mediamatters.org has also been covering the activity, and believes the actions are politically motivated and against federal law. All defendants have indicated they've been sued without any prior contact in the form of a take-down notice. A stop the LVRJ/RIGHTHAVEN witch hunt! Facebook group has started, and some of the recent targets appear to have the means to fight Righthaven and the LVRJ.

Submission + - BP Tied To Wild Horse Slaughter (abovetopsecret.com)

SpicyBrownMustard writes: Newly discovered evidence in the form of the Ruby Pipeline project contract ties BP to another environmental catastrophe under way in the western states of the US, the systematic removal and eventual destruction of federally protected wild mustang horses from public land, with the aid of the US Department of The Interior, in violation of federal law. BP is a primary investor in the natural gas pipeline being built through federally-protected wild mustang ranges in western states, resulting in a "Hiroshima" level devastation (as described by a pipeline worker) of the ecology and horses as a result of illegal wild horse roundups by the US Department of Interior. The video investigation covers the collusion of big oil and gas companies with the federal government to destroy a protected species to make way for the pipeline.

Submission + - BP has NEVER shown us the main leak! (abovetopsecret.com)

SpicyBrownMustard writes: BP has NEVER shown us the main leak: This has been troubling me for several weeks now. I knew there was something wrong with the live feed we were being shown by BP from the gulf oil spill. I just couldn't figure it out until now. They are still showing the PIPE leak from the two smaller pipes, not the actual wellhead leak. To prove it, here is a video from Yahoo of the feed from a couple weeks ago along with the attempt at dropping the dome onto the leak.

Submission + - Defamed by the Anti-Defamation League (abovetopsecret.com)

SpicyBrownMustard writes: The Anti-Defamation League published a recent report that classifies online political discourse as inciting violence, terrorism, and worse. One site featured in the report, abovetopsecret published a critical analysis titled, Internet Users Have Been Defamed by the Anti-Defamation League, among the most important is that the authors of the report never cited their sources, and sensationalized online quotes that were taken mercilessly out of context. We all know people tend to be much more macho when posting online than in real-life, is this an example of a political group taking advantage of that aspect of the Internet culture in an effort to quell the expression political frustration online?

Submission + - Worker Threatened to be Fired Over Web Site Visits (abovetopsecret.com)

SpicyBrownMustard writes: A poster going by the pseudonym of "Misoir" reports that his supervisor has threatened to fire him over a web site he visits on his personal time. He writes: "I work weekends at a grocery store called Win Dixie. Yesterday I was on a lunch break and the store supervisor walked up to me while I was sitting on a bench and on Above Top Secret via my laptop and he walked over and leaned against the wall. Then he leaned forward and told me that he doesn't want me visiting these websites because they lie and distort facts. I was stunned and did not reply, and then he started to walk away and told me if he catches me on this website again I will be fired." His full story is related here which brings up a number of interesting questions, including; can an employer rightfully control the online access of workers during break time?
The Internet

Submission + - The Plan To Kill Independent Web Sites

SpicyBrownMustard writes: There's been a great deal written about Representative Rick Boucher's efforts to impose an overt opt-in standard on all websites before showing third-party advertising (AdSense, ValueClick, etc.) to visitors. Boucher's stated claim is that, as the chairman of the House Subcommittee on telecommunications technology and the Internet he's very concerned about our privacy. However, the conspiracy theorists see a slightly different and much more nefarious motive, pulling the "financial rug" out form under independent websites, shifting the power and control back to big media, which just happens to be Boucher's campaign donors. The article by a "mister old school" proposes, "To the average person, this may seem like a drastic but reasonable action to ensure online privacy, in reality, it's a systematic plan of genocide that will destroy independent thought on the Internet." We may not particularly like much of the online ads we see, but the fact is, for sites like Slashdot, it pays the bills. What do Slashdotters think of this? Conspiracy or pandering?
The Internet

Submission + - Congressman Considers Ending Online Advertising

SpicyBrownMustard writes: US Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.) is contemplating the introduction of legislation that would essentially put an end to online advertising as we know it today, requiring advertisers to allow website users to "opt-in" before seeing any ads that use or create cookies for optimization or targeting purposes. "If Congress is leaning in that direction, it would mark a big shift in sentiment from last year, when some leading policymakers said that ISP-based targeting should require opt-in consent, but that cookie-based targeting requires only opt-out consent." This would result in a catastrophic shift in the only currently viable online economic model, destroying the ability of millions of small independent websites to survive.
Security

Submission + - Is GhostNet Reconnaissance For Internet Doomsday? (abovetopsecret.com)

SpicyBrownMustard writes: The person who broke the story on counterfeit routers installed on secure networks is speculating that GhostNet is a "weapons test" for cyber warfare. He writes, again on abovetopsecret : "GhostNet is cataloging potential networks and refining the cyber weapons for the next round of attacks. The activity seen thus far has been proof-of-concept tests of computer take-over software in preparation for larger-scale attacks." This is a startling reminder of the concerns we had over the Chinese counterfeit routers, now coupled with the high probability that GhostNet may have the backing of elements of the Chinese government.
The Internet

Submission + - The Top-10 Internet Conspiracy Theories (abovetopsecret.com)

SpicyBrownMustard writes: Above Top Secret finished a rather extensive poll to determine the top-ten conspiracy theories discussed online. After a surprise 159,620 votes in six days, the finished top-10 list has some familiar faces, as well as some new surprises... such as this commentary on the "controlled demolition" of the economy: "Now that the collective wealth (retirement savings and real estate equity) of the average person had been transitioned to easily manipulated equity markets, the stage was set. Those few who devised this decades-long plan reaped the financial rewards as the "bombs" were detonated and the economy collapsed inward, resulting in the hard-earned savings of millions of people very-nearly vanishing in mere months, and the values of their homes crashing so hard it created millions of people with negative equity. The populace was successfully stripped of their wealth."
Social Networks

Submission + - US User Investigated For Online Political Postings (abovetopsecret.com)

SpicyBrownMustard writes: An online discussion board user going by the pseudonym of "LeaderOfProgress," reports that someone has turned him in to the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation for his so-called radical postings detailing his opinions of the US Government. In his summary he details how agents came to his place of business to question him. He writes, "So I guess my views are now subject to investigation. I find humor in it knowing that even as I write this and post it they will be reading it. Guess its a good thing that I don't do anything illegal knowing now that that they have been watching everything I have done for the last couple of months." Several other users of the ATS discussion board report similar curiosity from law enforcement for their online opinions, as well as dozens of others offering opinions on how to deal with it.
Government

Submission + - Peter Schiff: "The Real Danger Is The Governme

SpicyBrownMustard writes: AboveTopSecret.com has a podcast interview with Peter Schiff, economic advisor to Ron Paul, a common face on all major TV/cable news, and they guy who foresaw the economic meltdown back in 2005. And as things get worse, he's got some frightening things to say about the economy and the government: "Not only is our economy in trouble, but our individual liberties and private property rights are under attack. And the more power we succeed to the government, under the hope that the government will use that power benevolently to help us... that's not what's going to happen. They're going to use the power against us, and not only are we going to loose our financial wealth, we're going to loose our freedoms. And if we don't have our freedoms, we're never going to get our economy back." More quotes and full interview HERE .
The Internet

Submission + - The Mainstream Media Has Picked Your Candidates

SpicyBrownMustard writes: Above Top Secret has an interesting analysis that compares significant spikes in online news coverage to the advertising budgets of the major candidates: "The U.S. media (broadcast, print, and major online news) has evolved into a sophisticated system that shapes the nature of which topics are important in the culture at large. The system works so well, that it has successfully killed the chances of a political candidate with phenomenal cultural buzz, in favor of candidates who will apparently result in an election race with the highest potential for optimum ratings and revenue." As a lucky-strike-extra, the analysis shows how the media has successfully countered the cultural buzz of candidate phenom, Ron Paul.
The Internet

Submission + - More Bandwidth Throttling: Pioneer Internet in OK

SpicyBrownMustard writes: A member at abovetopsecret.com has new information on bandwidth throttling by Pioneer Telephone Cooperative in Oklahoma. After a forced switch of all customers to digital cable TV service, bandwidth utilization is being throttled to favor the DTV service during prime-time hours. According to the author: "This is a monopoly and I have to say A VERY CLEAR EXAMPLE OF INTERNET RATIONING...get ready. All it takes is a little bit too much demand in your area and you'll get a taste of not having any control over your IT flow...some one else will decide what is most important and (when you're in a situation like I'm in where there isn't another game in town) you'll have to live with their decision." How many other rural users are paying for high speed access, only to see the only provider of such services severely throttle the bandwidth?
United States

Submission + - FBI Concerned Over Counterfeit Cisco Hardware

SpicyBrownMustard writes: An FBI Powerpoint presentation provides details about a criminal investigation into counterfeit CISCO hardware originating from China, and sold by Gold/Silver partners to numerous US government, military, and intelligence agencies. The concern of the article's author and the FBI is that the counterfeit equipment may be state-sponsored to aid in accessing otherwise secure systems (slides 46+47). Says the article author: "The threat is real. Compromised hardware of potentially hostile foreign origin sits within secure networks of the US government, military, and intelligence services. And as you now see, the FBI has been concerned about it."

Slashdot Top Deals

To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a test load.

Working...