Not exactly. You can have 1080p24, 1080p25, 1080p50 and 1080p60, each corresponding to a certain frame rate.

You cannot just finger point something and say it's communism and thus evil, just because it was financed by the government, it's not that simple. I am not saying that bank bailouts were good or bad. I'm just trying to make the point that ideology alone is not sufficient to make political decisions.

Would you say that Interstate Highways are communist? Maybe they are, but they are essential to the competitiveness of the US economy. Some people have never been on a highway in their entire life, but their taxes were still used to build these highways.

Similarly, banks are very important to the US economy. Not because of their direct contribution to the GDP, but because they provide an essential service to the economy. Had the banking system collapsed in 2008, it would have had very significant consequences. A few examples: how do you cash your paycheck when your bank is shut down? How do you pay for your groceries when the bank that emitted your credit card is shut down? How does your company get paid for the goods and services it provides, when its bank is shut down? How will you retire when your lifetime savings disappear when your bank goes bankrupt?

Again, I'm not saying that bailing out banks was good or bad. I'm saying that it wasn't an easy decision to take, and that it was done for a reason. Saying it's communism does not help much in the debate.

Actually, it has been a long time since banking secrecy in Switzerland does not hold when crime is involved. When any Swiss bank suspects funds originate from criminal activities (e.g. drug or weapon trafficking, etc), it has the legal obligation to report it to Swiss financial market authority. From there, an investigation will be open. More information here.

However, tax evasion is not considered as a crime in Switzerland. This means that until recently, Swiss banks or the government would not disclose any information to foreign governments when only tax evasion was suspected. In the past few years though, international pressure on the Swiss government obliged it to ease the banking secrecy to the point where there is no secrecy anymore, except for permanent Swiss residents.

Maybe this will convince you ?

In Switzerland, cycling directions are available (in addition to car, foot and public transport).

No, Chuck Norris is!

I haven't tried WP7 so I cannot speak for it, but I don't share your view on Android, especially on ICS. Android is now far from the early days when it was more for geeks (which I am) than average users. I just exchanged my faulty HTC Desire (Froyo) for a Galaxy Nexus (the SIII was too expensive in my opinion), and I was amazed by how smooth and polished it is. Very simple setup for both my private GMail (including Calendar, Contacts and Drive) account and my company Exchange account. Several missing features in were finally added (e.g. better contact search and sort capabilities) and the overall experience is really good. No need to tweak obscure settings or install half a dozen apps to palliate for missing features. I'm just a bit disappointed by the battery life (about one day for an moderate-intensive usage pattern).

It's even worse than that: the copyright expires 70 years after the author's death. Mein Kampf was written 87 years ago, in 1925...

Wrong. Gamma rays are also electromagnetic waves, but with a higher frequency than X rays. It is true, however, that alpha and beta rays are made of electrons/protons, which is different.

From what we know today, the only thing that matters for cancer risk is whether the radiation is ionizing or not. If it is (X rays, gamma rays, alpha and beta particles, ultraviolet rays), it CAN cause cancer. If it isn't (microwave, visible light, infrared, everything below), it CANNOT cause cancer (as far as we know). This is why it is unlikely that mobile phones can cause cancer (they use microwaves).

Or use Synergy. I've been using it for about 2 years not and it works great. The best part is the ability to use copy-paste from one computer to the other.

RTFS again.

I do care, not because I am a stockholder, but because I don't see my well being only but also the well being of society in general. Living in a capitalist world is not an excuse for acting like an asshole.

Their huge remunerations could be tolerable if they bear the responsibility of their actions, including the bad ones. Currently, they will be paid huge bonuses when quarterly profits are high. When these same profits are low or the company makes a loss, the CEO will leave with a huge golden parachute.

High remuneration of CEOs may be ok when there is a high risk, but today, where is the risk?