True, but you're not going to find those Bushmasters for sale in Connecticut where new AR-15's have already been outlawed.
That's only partially true. Yeah, Bushmaster might not yet have any compliant guns for the new CT laws, but Stag Arms already does. You can bet that others will follow suit once sales get going.
Looks like they are the car models that are mostly driven by younger drivers
Sure, but where is the Jeep Wrangler, the (base model) Chevy Camaro, the Ford Focus, or the Honda Civic? I would have expected those to have been high on the list for the same reason but they are all quite a ways down. The problem here is that the list depends on people to get tickets and then come to this insurance company for a quote. It would be a lot more informative to have a list of all the tickets issued in a year, but that would be a lot more difficult to obtain and compile.
It's unlikely there's any significant "self reporting bias," as you seem to be implying, which would be caused by drivers being deceptive about the vehicles they're actively seeking insurance quotes on.
Perhaps I was not adequately clear on this. What I was after is that this is just reporting to one insurance company, and reporting only based on people who have gone to this insurance company for a quote for insurance on their vehicle. Hence all we have here are people who were ticketed and then at some point after decided to get a quote for insurance through this particular company / web site.
To really know how this relates to the real world, we would need to know at least how the distribution of vehicles that they insure compare to the distribution of vehicles nationwide.
Insurance.com analyzed online quote information submitted by 557,238 drivers January 2013 to July 2014. Ticket data calculated for models with 50 or more quotes.
The issue is that people learn Photoshop, they don't learn the fundamentals for the tool.
I'm not sure how that would effect sales. Are people who learned Photoshop without understanding how it works really be likely Linux users? I think the overlap on those sets is vanishingly small.
So they switch to GIMP and then find it's horrible because their skills don't transfer and they cry on the internet that "GIMP SUX" because they don't want to relearn anything.
First of all, I can tell you that I have used a significant number of Photoshop tutorials in GIMP to do various functions and found that they work just fine.
Second, the most critical (by frequency of use) tools in Photoshop are the technical adjustments - color, levels, curves, etc. They work the same in GIMP and are even in the same menus. There is no significant relearning to do. My wife uses Photoshop and Illustrator (as well as InDesign) professionally on a daily basis. A while back we were traveling with only my laptop, which has GIMP and Inkscape but nothing from Adobe. She was able to get by just fine for a quick job while we were out; going well beyond the use level that I get from GIMP even though I use it almost daily.
This is even worse in a business situation because relearning things pushes back deadlines and impacts quality
I'm not sure how this applies. How many businesses are running Linux workstations and need Adobe on them? Again this seems to me like a likely very small set. I don't see the absence of Adobe software in Linux as being a critical impediment to Linux migration for businesses who want to do that, either.
Yet you were the person so sure that the stock would tank that you shorted it and got millions? No, didn't think so.
The stock market has been, for quite some time now, a casino for the wealthy. I was one of many who knew that it was drastically overvalued but had no way to make money on that knowledge. Even to short sell, based on the insane IPO price, required vastly more expendable money than I or most others had.
Turning to a case study of scientific communication, another online sample of adults described public attitudes toward climate scientists specifically.
We already know that a large portion of our country is repeatedly fed biased misinformation on this topic and told to distrust anyone who represents an opposing viewpoint. If we tried this on something that is less of a political football, we would likely see very different results. I would doubt that anywhere near as many people would doubt scientists telling them about research on gravity or the spheroid shape of our planet.
"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra