Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment People who don't read it are telling us about it (Score 2) 65

I used to read it regularly when flying. This was primarily because reading skymall was free, while buying a magazine at the airport was expensive (and I inevitably would forget to pick one up some place less expensive before going to the airport). While it wasn't exactly bursting at the seams with good deals, there were some things selling at reasonable prices in there. The more novel feature of it was that it was a pretty random selection of products; one page might be garden supplies while the next might be pool toys then power tools then kitchen accessories.

Now did I ever buy anything from it? No. So I am in part responsible for its demise as well.

I'm more concerned about the possibility of this becoming an excuse for the airlines to raise fares yet again. If skymall paid the airlines even $3 per seat to have their catalog in every seat back, the airlines will tell us that losing that contribution will increase the cost of every ticket by at least $20 (expect this to show up as an a la carte fee along with pillows, blankets, snacks, and seat belts).

Comment Re:One has to wonder (Score 5, Insightful) 253

I'm sorry that you can't be bothered to actually read the sources that you link to. Well, actually the source you link to, as one is just a blog post. The WashPo article actually discredits your conspiracy conjecture, but since you couldn't be bothered to read it you don't know that.

Anyone with the slightest shred of common sense realizes that the IRS was doing their job. In case you have forgotten, the role of the IRS is to collect taxes. If they get an application for tax exempt status from a group that is vehemently opposed to taxation and known for making statement encouraging people to cheat on their taxes, they should put extra scrutiny on that application.

This is no different from the DEA aiming to work harder investigating NORML and other such pro-drug organizations.

In other words, find a different conspiracy for your anger. This one isn't worth shit.

Comment Re:These are senior retired officers (Score 1) 9

Presumably, they're getting some double-hush-hush info from People Who Know. I guess.

So again, it comes down to what you want to believe, having absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with anything that you have facts to support the belief in.

Not that I actually care, mind you:

As cousin Balky says, don't be ridiculous. We all know this is your top conspiracy conjecture. You didn't post it just to get eyeballs and comments over here, you posted it because you believe it will help your quest to bring about a premature end of the current POTUS.

Comment What is their actual gripe? (Score 1) 9

How is this different from any other conservative group that is disappointed to see that all the independent investigations have failed to impeach President Lawnchair? Complaining that an investigation didn't live up to your dreams is not the same as having an actual problem with it that is based on facts instead of feelings.

Comment Re:The reason we didn't get single pay (Score 1) 238

is the insurance industry spent half a billion dollars in 1 year on anti-single payer campaigns.

And that was just on money that went straight from the industry to politicians, in the form of campaign contributions or outright bribes. Imagine how much they would have spent if they didn't already own congress and had to play fair...

They were fighting for their lives, and they won.

And the rest of America lost.

Comment It's a trap! (Score 4, Insightful) 238

Seriously Google, don't mess with the insurance industry. Don't mess with any part of it. They will make you pay. Look at what happened in 2010; we thought we were going to finally get a single-payer option for Americans and instead the federal government handed out the largest corporate handout in the history of government to the health insurance industry.

If Google tries to disrupt the insurance industry we soon will have no Google.

Submission + - Fox News Apologizes for False Claims of Muslim-Only Areas in England and France (nytimes.com) 1

operator_error writes: Fox News issued an unusual on-air apology on Saturday night for having allowed its anchors and guests to repeat the false claim for a week, that there are Muslim-only “no-go zones” in European countries like England and France that are not under the control of the state and are ruled according to Shariah law.

Fox Report host Julie Banderas, said that “over the course of this last week, we have made some regrettable errors on air regarding the Muslim population in Europe, particularly with regard to England and France.”

“Now this applies especially to discussions of so-called no-go zones, areas where non-Muslims allegedly are not allowed in and police supposedly won’t go,” Ms. Banderas continued. “To be clear, there is no formal designation of these zones in either country and no credible information to support the assertion that there are specific areas in these countries that exclude individuals based solely on their religion.”

The claim that such areas existed attracted widespread attention, and a wave of online derision."

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...