I see a large grant in your future.
A grant from General Mills or another cereal producer, perhaps. As someone who has spent time working on federal (in particular NIH, NSF, DOE) grant applications I can tell you that this wouldn't fly with them - at least, not in the current fiscal climates that they all face.
Why should I take those claims at face value?
What, do you want to meet in person and see some diplomas? LinkedIn profile? Résumé?
No. I don't have time to meet you in person and all the rest can be faked. What cannot be faked however is your lengthy record of being anti-learning here on slashdot.
More so, why should I take them at face value when you repeatedly demonstrate your disdain for facts and learning?
I have never done this.
That is a lie. Your own journal entries show your disdain for knowledge and preference for fact-free spin (and that is just one obvious example of you doing that).
"damn_registrars is a serial accuser".
It would be interesting to know what you think you are saying by that.
God strike me dead as I type if I'm lying
... as if such statements have ever panned out
I've never been dishonest with you.
Except for all the times that you have been.
nota bene: The word choice employed here is meant in a humorous, mocking vein, not as a literal statement about gender in this case.
Your distractions are so reliably hilarious, too!
If you haven't been fucked by your insurance company yet,[...]; you can't win or even hope to break even.
Well, while you probably didn't have any say in being born in America, you (probably, criminal record and skills permitting) have the option of leaving to live in the civilized world somewhere. Maybe the Canadians would accept you?
As someone who has looked into doing exactly that, I can tell you that is actually a lot more difficult than what some want us to believe it to be. If you are an American and you want to move to Canada, you need to have a job offer first, and then you still need to take the entrance exam to determine if you will be allowed to emigrate. You can't just simply drive across the border and start looking for work. Furthermore there is little (if any) incentive for Canadian employers to hire Americans; you have to be a really truly exceptional applicant for a very highly skilled position in order for the employer to be able to justify hiring you.
I'm not sure where the free world is, but Americans are generally not welcomed in it.
I guess that fits well with your disdain for literacy, though - and your general attitude against education as well.
Yeah, an engineering degree, two master's degrees, and the core work toward a doctorate--you, like, totally outed me as a pro-ignorance, anti-learning, recidivist there
Why should I take those claims at face value? More so, why should I take them at face value when you repeatedly demonstrate your disdain for facts and learning? You can use your comments here to make whatever claims you want regarding your life accomplishments, but when you brag about illiteracy they make me doubt your claims of educational merit.
your approach to pure, vicious fictitiousness
The notion of my assessment of you being vicious or fictitious is purely a creation of your own imagination. I evaluate your intellectual dishonesty by reading the comments you write here on slashdot.
I have known people who feel that life doesn't start until they are stoned, and they are not content to stay home or out of the way. They also believe that society owes it to them to welcome them when they are under the influence and that they are the life of the party at that point.
I've known one or two like that. They're idiots. The ones I've known like that all started smoking in adolescence.
I've seen studies support the notion that the magnitude of pot problems in smokers goes up in correlation with younger ages of starting, and I have seen that myself.
And since when are you the guy who apparently makes all the rules for posters on Slashdot?
Nice one, there. Few people put cherries on turd sundaes with your degree of showmanship. I'm sure you're proud of yourself. Thanks for mixing up the week for me.
My all-time favorite phone was the old Motorola Razr. It was a "feature phone" but you could get on the internet with it, text, play games on it, it had a camera, etc. It had features Android (at least Jellybean) lacks. One thing I loved about it was you could set it to automatically answer in speakerphone mode. Great for traveling, with my Android it sits in my pocket ringing and buzzing and I have to call back after I stop. And it was really small, its best feature IMO.
I never had the Razr (though I did have the RIZR which I thought was pretty cool aside from the fact that the most important buttons were stickers that eventually fell off and seriously hindered the usability of the phone). One of my all-time favorites was the samsung 3500 or n200 which were flip phones designed such that the entire screen was visible - though the keys protected - when the phone was flipped closed. It was comparable in size to the Razr. They also had great batttery life and there were extended-life batteries available for them to go even longer (my LG android phone makes it about 6-8 hours on idle before going completely dead).
As for giant phones I've seen a surge in people using the Samsung Galaxy Note as a phone, it is almost comically large for a phone. Where they carry it I have no idea.
Were there some way to survey the readership, I'm confident that I would not look the greater ass,
You are the one who has fooled himself into thinking this site has some sort of significant readership - and you're trying to claim to not be "the greater ass"?
"More software projects have gone awry for lack of calendar time than for all other causes combined." -- Fred Brooks, Jr., _The Mythical Man Month_