You failed to offer a source you'd accept.
No, I refuse to play along with your game of Move the Goalposts. Just because it is a favorite pastime of your political party doesn't mean I care for it.
You have not attempted to cite any sources beyond a crappy youtube video. Give me a print transcript from a decent source and I'll consider reading it. Conspiracy videos aren't worth my time, I can read faster than they can talk.
Do you have a comment on the issue that is not about a source?
I gave you many comments in my first reply to your first comment here. Rather unsurprisingly you did not respond to any of my points and comments. You are trying to scare people into thinking that a radical change that will never happen is imminent, and it just makes you look ridiculous. There are plenty of things wrong with the Obama administration, but an abundance of competence is not one of them - and would be required in order to pull off what you claim they are aiming to do. They have no method for bringing about this radical transformation, and your insistence otherwise does not change that.
But feel free to keep calling me names instead if that makes you feel better. I can't force you to do any of these things
The problem with all that is that the long term game is that the insurance companies get replaced by some single payer system.
A lot of people try to make that argument, but none can support it. There is absolutely no way in hell that a single payer system would pass at the federal level in the next decade, and that is being optimistic. The insurance industry is just too powerful; we currently have a POTUS who campaigned in support of single payer, and we ended up with a bill about as far from that as you can get. We had a slim chance back in 2009/2010 to try to make it happen but the insurance industry flexed their muscle and came to congress looking for return on their investment.
Part of the issue is that the insurance companies exist in an extremely regulated market.
That is pure malarkey. The insurance companies set the rules on their own, and now they have a lock on the American consumer. There are no meaningful regulations on the industry, only window dressings that they point to when complaining about how much "better" things would be with no regulations at all.
They are very vulnerable to intimidation by the government.
OK, you must be joking now. No sane person would be able to write that line with a straight face. The insurance industry owns most of congress - on both sides of the aisle. If they don't get what they want from their investment, they make sure that person doesn't win reelection. The mob never had it this good.
prohibits public accommodations, including businesses such as Masterpiece Cakeshop, from refusing service based on factors such as race, sex, marital status or sexual orientation.
Hence they were willingly and blatantly violating the law.
Even so, companies break out of contracts all the time - why should that be any different?
Can you provide an example where it was any different? When companies break out of contracts they have penalties for doing so. From what I've seen it has been exactly the same as any other company breaking out of a contract.
Politics: A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage. -- Ambrose Bierce