I know I may be a bit utopian in my thinking, but wouldn't giving these users a good customer experience (as Microsoft calls it) the best way to convince them that they should in fact go out and buy the software - perhaps not even now, but the next time they upgrade their systems?
No, it would more likely convince them that "hey, I got this great customer experience without even ever spending a dime, why spend money for what I can continue getting for free?" Not that I disagree (or agree for that matter) with allowing pirated users the option to use the software, I just think your logic is off.
Creepy? I'll say. Mabe even downright stupid.
Not at all. The summary clearly states that it requires 2 people that YOU appoint to confirm death before they will send the e-mail. This means these two people need to know about the service. I would suppose in most cases at least one of these two would be your intended recipient, meaning they know to expect the e-mail. Even if people receiving it weren't on your confirmation list I'm sure the site's intention is to warn those who would receive the e-mail before passing so there are no bad surprises.
You may not agree with the service (I know I certainly don't, I agree with you that a hand written message is best) but just because you don't think it's useful doesn't make it pathetic. Ultimately, if people sign up for the service it will survive, if not then it was a bad idea and it will fade away.
Not a big enough difference from the last generation.......? Good God man, what are you smoking...? Do you even know what the Wii is? Because if you ask me, your comment applies to the other two consoles more so than it does to the Wii.
What's so different about the Xbox 360 from the Xbox...? Well, other than a prettier face, nothing really. It uses practically the same controller (moving two buttons does not constitute enough of a change), actually LACKS the built-in hard drive its predecessor had, and introduces wireless controllers, which have been available since at least the SNES era.
How about the PS3....? Again, a prettier face but that's about it here as well. It's pretty much the same damn controller that's been used since the Playstation. It's got a hard drive but that was done last generation. Online service....? Xbox 1 did that. Motion sensor in the controller....? Ummmm, yeah, we won't even get STARTED on that. Oh, but I forgot the biggest difference between the PS3 and the PS2; no one's buying it!
If you sit down and look at it, the Wii is the ONLY system that is really something different from the last generation. The other two systems are more or less visual upgrades to consoles of the past while the Wii demands an entirely new way of looking at and playing video games. To be honest, the Wii is the first console that has shown a real "change" in gaming since the Nintendo 64 introduced the ability to push out games in 3D, everything else has been just visual upgrades, though you can make a case that with Live! Xbox marked a significant change as well (the counter-case would be that PC games had already been doing that for years, but since we're talking consoles here we won't consider that).
Every person who considers how much something has changed by it's looks needs to actually sit down and think about it, because the cosmetics are probably one of the smallest factors of change in my opinion.
Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.